GSEP vs. PNQI
GSEP (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September) and PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSEP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while PNQI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Internet Index. GSEP is actively managed, while PNQI is passively managed. Over the past year, GSEP returned 14.37% vs -0.73% for PNQI. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSEP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for PNQI.
Performance
GSEP vs. PNQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSEP achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly higher than PNQI's -9.55% return.
GSEP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 6.02%
- 1Y
- 14.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PNQI
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- -9.55%
- 6M
- -10.27%
- 1Y
- -0.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.32%
- 5Y*
- 0.81%
- 10Y*
- 12.05%
GSEP vs. PNQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September | 5.47% | 10.56% | 10.85% | 4.70% |
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | -9.55% | 15.56% | 29.44% | 13.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEP and PNQI is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023 | 0.76 |
The correlation between GSEP and PNQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSEP vs. PNQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSEP
PNQI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
GSEP
PNQI
Financial Services
GSEP
PNQI
Communication Services
GSEP
PNQI
Consumer Cyclical
GSEP
PNQI
Healthcare
GSEP
PNQI
Industrials
GSEP
PNQI
Consumer Defensive
GSEP
PNQI
-
Energy
GSEP
PNQI
-
Utilities
GSEP
PNQI
-
Real Estate
GSEP
PNQI
Basic Materials
GSEP
PNQI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSEP vs. PNQI — Risk / Return Rank
GSEP
PNQI
GSEP vs. PNQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September (GSEP) and Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSEP | PNQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | -0.04 | +2.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | 0.07 | +3.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.01 | +0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | -0.01 | +3.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.72 | -0.02 | +16.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSEP | PNQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | -0.04 | +2.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.57 | 0.52 | +1.04 |
Drawdowns
GSEP vs. PNQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEP drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, smaller than the maximum PNQI drawdown of -59.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEP and PNQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEP | PNQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.09% | -59.70% | +49.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.44% | -24.85% | +20.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -14.52% | +14.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.74% | -12.96% | +12.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 10.47% | -9.60% |
Volatility
GSEP vs. PNQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September (GSEP) is 1.00%, while Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that GSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSEP | PNQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 4.39% | -3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.74% | 13.76% | -9.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.96% | 17.99% | -12.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.60% | 26.81% | -19.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.60% | 25.29% | -17.69% |
GSEP vs. PNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PNQI's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSEP vs. PNQI - Dividend Comparison
GSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSEP and PNQI have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNQI has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to GSEP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEP dropped -10.09% vs PNQI's -59.70%.
On 1-year performance, GSEP leads with 14.37% vs -0.73% for PNQI. On fees, PNQI is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, GSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GSEP has performed better with a 14.37% return vs -0.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PNQI is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GSEP.
PNQI has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for GSEP.
GSEP is categorized as Options Trading, while PNQI is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GSEP and 0.62% for PNQI.
GSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSEP and PNQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer