GSEP vs. PNQI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GSEP (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September) and PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSEP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while PNQI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Internet Index. GSEP is actively managed, while PNQI is passively managed. Over the past year, GSEP returned 11.93% vs -4.33% for PNQI. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GSEP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for PNQI.

Performance

GSEP vs. PNQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September (GSEP) and Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEP achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly higher than PNQI's -9.13% return.

GSEP

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 0.84%
• 6M: 5.77%
• YTD: 6.61%
• 1Y: 11.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.55%

PNQI

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 3.25%
• 6M: -4.48%
• YTD: -9.13%
• 1Y: -4.33%
• 3Y*: 13.67%
• 5Y*: -0.37%
• 10Y*: 11.74%
• ALL TIME*: 13.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September	$768.49K	$1.16M	$3.28M
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF	$4.40M	$3.35M	$2.63M

GSEP vs. PNQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September	6.61%	10.56%	10.85%	4.70%
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF	-9.13%	15.56%	29.44%	12.51%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEP and PNQI is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023	0.74

The correlation between GSEP and PNQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GSEP vs. PNQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSEP

GSEP Risk / Return Rank: 81
GSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
GSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 84
GSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
GSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 86

PNQI

PNQI Risk / Return Rank: 7
PNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
PNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSEP vs. PNQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September (GSEP) and Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSEP	PNQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	-0.35	+2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	-0.35	+2.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	0.96	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	-0.28	+2.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.62	-0.55	+13.17

GSEP vs. PNQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the PNQI Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEP and PNQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSEP vs. PNQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEP drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, smaller than the maximum PNQI drawdown of -59.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEP and PNQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSEP	PNQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.09%	-59.70%	+49.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.44%	-24.85%	+20.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.85%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-59.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-14.12%	+14.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.71%	-13.00%	+12.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	12.67%	-11.78%

Volatility

GSEP vs. PNQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September (GSEP) is 1.40%, while Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) has a volatility of 6.38%. This indicates that GSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSEP	PNQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.40%	6.38%	-4.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.80%	16.57%	-11.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.11%	20.14%	-14.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.49%	27.04%	-19.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.49%	25.37%	-17.88%

GSEP vs. PNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PNQI's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSEP vs. PNQI - Dividend Comparison

Neither GSEP nor PNQI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSEP and PNQI in my portfolio?

GSEP and PNQI have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSEP or PNQI?

PNQI has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to GSEP (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEP dropped -10.09% vs PNQI's -59.70%.

Which ETF is better, GSEP or PNQI?

On 1-year performance, GSEP leads with 11.93% vs -4.33% for PNQI. On fees, PNQI is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, GSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSEP or PNQI?

Over the 1-year period, GSEP has performed better with a 11.93% return vs -4.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSEP or PNQI?

PNQI is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GSEP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSEP or PNQI?

GSEP and PNQI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GSEP and PNQI?

GSEP is categorized as Options Trading, while PNQI is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GSEP and 0.62% for PNQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.