GSEE vs. EWY
GSEE (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - GSEE tracks the Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while EWY tracks the MSCI Korea Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSEE returned 7.49%/yr vs 20.31%/yr for EWY. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSEE charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWY.
Performance
GSEE vs. EWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSEE achieves a 27.44% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 119.05% return.
GSEE
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 27.44%
- 6M
- 30.18%
- 1Y
- 54.30%
- 3Y*
- 23.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- —
EWY
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 30.18%
- YTD
- 119.05%
- 6M
- 134.13%
- 1Y
- 251.82%
- 3Y*
- 51.99%
- 5Y*
- 20.31%
- 10Y*
- 17.46%
GSEE vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 27.44% | 33.38% | 4.94% | 11.03% | -19.57% | -2.61% | 43.54% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 119.05% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 73.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEE and EWY is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between GSEE and EWY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSEE vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSEE
EWY
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
GSEE
EWY
Financial Services
GSEE
EWY
Consumer Cyclical
GSEE
EWY
Industrials
GSEE
EWY
Communication Services
GSEE
EWY
Basic Materials
GSEE
EWY
Energy
GSEE
EWY
Healthcare
GSEE
EWY
Consumer Defensive
GSEE
EWY
Utilities
GSEE
EWY
Real Estate
GSEE
EWY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSEE vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank
GSEE
EWY
GSEE vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSEE | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.74 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 10.99 | -6.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.02 | 40.91 | -24.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSEE | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 6.02 | -3.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.71 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.33 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
GSEE vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEE drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, smaller than the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEE and EWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEE | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.51% | -74.14% | +36.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | -23.08% | +10.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.39% | -27.36% | +9.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.97% | -48.55% | +13.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -1.73% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.73% | -20.13% | +5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 6.19% | -2.79% |
Volatility
GSEE vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) is 8.68%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 20.32%. This indicates that GSEE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSEE | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.68% | 20.32% | -11.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.80% | 37.41% | -20.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 42.10% | -22.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 28.83% | -10.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 27.37% | -8.98% |
GSEE vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSEE vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison
GSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than EWY's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 0.96% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.98% | 2.53% | 2.79% | 3.07% | 3.05% | 6.10% | 2.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSEE and EWY have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (20.32%) compared to GSEE (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEE dropped -37.51% vs EWY's -74.14%.
On 5-year performance, EWY leads with 20.31% vs 7.49% for GSEE. On fees, GSEE is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, GSEE has been the lower-risk option at 8.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EWY has performed better with a 20.31% return vs 7.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSEE is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
GSEE has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.96% for EWY.
GSEE tracks Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for GSEE and 0.59% for EWY.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.02 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSEE and EWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer