PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEE vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEE vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEE achieves a 17.86% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 25.22% return.


GSEE

1D
0.58%
1M
-2.03%
6M
8.46%
YTD
17.86%
1Y
34.63%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.32%

BITI

1D
-1.48%
1M
-4.03%
6M
13.09%
YTD
25.22%
1Y
56.28%
3Y*
-32.35%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-35.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.18M$25.87M$38.72M
$246.11K$164.63K$181.97K

GSEE vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GSEE
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
17.86%33.38%4.94%11.03%-3.96%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
25.22%-1.76%-62.60%-66.17%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEE and BITI is -0.48, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022

-0.35

The correlation between GSEE and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.48 (1 year) to -0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEE vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSEE
GSEE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSEE vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSEEBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.22

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

2.24

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

5.45

+2.13

GSEE vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEE Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEE and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSEE vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEE drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEE and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEEBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.51%

-92.16%

+54.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.07%

-25.28%

+11.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.39%

-84.63%

+67.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.53%

-86.33%

+76.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.52%

-68.61%

+54.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

10.37%

-5.79%

Volatility

GSEE vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) have volatilities of 8.62% and 8.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEEBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.62%

8.93%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.51%

33.35%

-11.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.79%

44.25%

-20.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.12%

52.01%

-32.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.03%

52.01%

-32.98%

GSEE vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSEE vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

GSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than BITI's 21.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
21.80%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%0.00%0.00%
GSEE
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.15%2.53%2.79%3.07%3.05%6.10%2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSEE and BITI have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITI has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to GSEE (8.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEE dropped -37.51% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 3-year performance, GSEE leads with 18.94% vs -32.35% for BITI. On fees, GSEE is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, GSEE has been the lower-risk option at 8.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GSEE has performed better with a 18.94% return vs -32.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEE is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 21.80%, compared with 2.15% for GSEE.

GSEE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. GSEE tracks Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for GSEE and 1.03% for BITI.

GSEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEE and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer