PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSCYX vs. TISBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSCYX vs. TISBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSCYX achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly lower than TISBX's 17.14% return. Over the past 10 years, GSCYX has underperformed TISBX with an annualized return of 10.04%, while TISBX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.94% annualized return.


GSCYX

1D
-1.08%
1M
0.57%
YTD
13.26%
6M
12.30%
1Y
27.51%
3Y*
14.12%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
10.04%

TISBX

1D
-1.30%
1M
1.85%
YTD
17.14%
6M
14.97%
1Y
39.54%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSCYX vs. TISBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSCYX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund
13.26%6.03%10.58%14.91%-17.84%22.04%20.07%25.28%-12.62%13.12%
TISBX
TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund
17.14%12.72%11.60%17.07%-20.31%14.85%20.14%25.61%-10.99%13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GSCYX and TISBX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002

0.98

The correlation between GSCYX and TISBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSCYX vs. TISBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSCYX
GSCYX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GSCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GSCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

TISBX
TISBX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TISBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TISBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TISBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TISBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TISBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSCYX vs. TISBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSCYXTISBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.62

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.15

12.81

-3.66

GSCYX vs. TISBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSCYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the TISBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSCYX and TISBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSCYXTISBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

2.07

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.28

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.47

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.39

-0.18

Drawdowns

GSCYX vs. TISBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSCYX drawdown since its inception was -63.53%, which is greater than TISBX's maximum drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCYX and TISBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSCYXTISBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.53%

-56.50%

-7.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-10.95%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.51%

-27.44%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.95%

-31.89%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.83%

-41.69%

+0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-1.43%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.15%

-9.68%

-5.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

3.08%

-0.11%

Volatility

GSCYX vs. TISBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) is 5.11%, while TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that GSCYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TISBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSCYXTISBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

5.74%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

13.65%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.72%

19.22%

-1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.51%

22.56%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.33%

23.43%

-0.10%

GSCYX vs. TISBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSCYX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than TISBX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSCYX vs. TISBX - Dividend Comparison

GSCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.98%, more than TISBX's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSCYX
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund
9.98%11.30%6.14%2.65%5.13%16.30%1.07%3.87%24.79%7.81%1.46%6.08%
TISBX
TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund
3.52%4.12%6.82%3.09%1.97%8.96%2.65%5.16%9.29%4.49%4.03%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, GSCYX and TISBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TISBX has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to GSCYX (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSCYX dropped -63.53% vs TISBX's -56.50%.

TISBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSCYX and TISBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer