TISBX vs. RGAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX).
TISBX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002. RGAGX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Dec 1, 1973.
Performance
TISBX vs. RGAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TISBX vs. RGAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund | 0.89% | 12.72% | 11.60% | 17.07% | -20.31% | 14.85% | 20.14% | 25.61% | -10.99% | 13.14% |
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 | -7.99% | 20.08% | 28.41% | 37.66% | -30.53% | 19.67% | 38.30% | 29.22% | -2.88% | 26.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TISBX achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly higher than RGAGX's -7.99% return. Over the past 10 years, TISBX has underperformed RGAGX with an annualized return of 9.78%, while RGAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.74% annualized return.
TISBX
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- -5.85%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- 25.58%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
RGAGX
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -7.99%
- 6M
- -7.03%
- 1Y
- 17.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 14.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TISBX vs. RGAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TISBX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than RGAGX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TISBX vs. RGAGX — Risk / Return Rank
TISBX
RGAGX
TISBX vs. RGAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TISBX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 0.86 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 1.37 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.29 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.05 | 4.90 | +1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TISBX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 0.86 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.46 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.75 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.80 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between TISBX and RGAGX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TISBX vs. RGAGX - Dividend Comparison
TISBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than RGAGX's 11.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund | 4.09% | 4.12% | 6.82% | 3.09% | 1.97% | 8.96% | 2.65% | 5.16% | 9.29% | 4.49% | 4.03% | 4.77% |
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 | 11.95% | 10.99% | 9.29% | 7.70% | 4.44% | 8.49% | 4.57% | 7.93% | 12.36% | 7.34% | 6.95% | 9.22% |
Drawdowns
TISBX vs. RGAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TISBX drawdown since its inception was -56.50%, which is greater than RGAGX's maximum drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TISBX and RGAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TISBX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.50% | -36.19% | -20.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.90% | -13.71% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.89% | -36.19% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.69% | -36.19% | -5.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.88% | -10.64% | +2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -5.53% | -4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 3.62% | +0.08% |
Volatility
TISBX vs. RGAGX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) at 6.74%. This indicates that TISBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TISBX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 6.74% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.50% | 12.12% | +2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.37% | 21.00% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 20.23% | +2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 19.64% | +3.75% |