PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSC vs. GPIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GSC vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GSC vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GSC
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF
0.60%6.29%13.79%18.12%
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
-3.90%19.77%23.22%15.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSC achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than GPIQ's -3.90% return.


GSC

1D
4.03%
1M
-6.15%
YTD
0.60%
6M
2.68%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
20.49%
5Y*
28.12%
10Y*
11.14%

GPIQ

1D
3.19%
1M
-3.94%
YTD
-3.90%
6M
-0.56%
1Y
23.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GSC vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GSC vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSC
GSC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSC Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIQ
GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSC vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSCGPIQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.04

1.14

-1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.79

1.77

+2.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.92

1.27

+0.65

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

1.92

-1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.01

8.84

-7.83

GSC vs. GPIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSC and GPIQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSCGPIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

1.14

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

1.28

-1.29

Correlation

The correlation between GSC and GPIQ is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GSC vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

GSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than GPIQ's 10.68% yield.


TTM202520242023
GSC
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF
0.19%0.16%0.66%0.11%
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
10.68%9.81%9.18%1.74%

Drawdowns

GSC vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSC drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSC and GPIQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GSCGPIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.63%

-21.06%

-67.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.25%

-12.08%

-46.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.25%

-6.63%

-33.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.52%

-2.37%

-57.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.28%

2.62%

+14.66%

Volatility

GSC vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) has a higher volatility of 8.12% compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) at 6.08%. This indicates that GSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GSCGPIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.12%

6.08%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

313.02%

11.17%

+301.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

410.88%

20.42%

+390.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

219.28%

17.74%

+201.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

160.40%

17.74%

+142.66%