PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSC vs. DGRS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSC vs. DGRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSC achieves a 21.55% return, which is significantly higher than DGRS's 18.11% return. Over the past 10 years, GSC has outperformed DGRS with an annualized return of 11.56%, while DGRS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.20% annualized return.


GSC

1D
-1.20%
1M
7.98%
YTD
21.55%
6M
18.78%
1Y
33.32%
3Y*
28.34%
5Y*
24.30%
10Y*
11.56%

DGRS

1D
0.27%
1M
4.10%
YTD
18.11%
6M
16.32%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSC vs. DGRS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSC
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF
21.55%6.29%13.79%33.52%28.40%58.09%-33.08%29.69%-19.52%2.90%
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
18.11%-0.43%10.40%21.16%-13.11%23.11%7.86%24.20%-10.75%7.25%

Correlation

The correlation between GSC and DGRS is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2013

0.28

Over the past year, GSC and DGRS have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

GSC vs. DGRS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSC
DGRS

Technology

22.7%
9.2%

Industrials

19.2%
19.1%

Financial Services

16.1%
25.5%

Healthcare

13.6%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
16.1%

Basic Materials

5.2%
8.1%

Energy

3.9%
10.8%

Utilities

3.0%
0.2%

Real Estate

2.6%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
6.3%

Communication Services

0.9%
1.9%

Technology

GSC
22.7%
DGRS
9.2%

Industrials

GSC
19.2%
DGRS
19.1%

Financial Services

GSC
16.1%
DGRS
25.5%

Healthcare

GSC
13.6%
DGRS
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GSC
10.4%
DGRS
16.1%

Basic Materials

GSC
5.2%
DGRS
8.1%

Energy

GSC
3.9%
DGRS
10.8%

Utilities

GSC
3.0%
DGRS
0.2%

Real Estate

GSC
2.6%
DGRS
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

GSC
2.4%
DGRS
6.3%

Communication Services

GSC
0.9%
DGRS
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSC vs. DGRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSC
GSC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSC Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRS
DGRS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DGRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSC vs. DGRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSCDGRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.99

1.29

+0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

3.03

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.98

9.34

-7.37

GSC vs. DGRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the DGRS Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSC and DGRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSC vs. DGRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSC drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than DGRS's maximum drawdown of -44.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSC and DGRS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSCDGRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.63%

-44.83%

-43.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.25%

-9.68%

-48.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.25%

-27.57%

-30.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.25%

-27.57%

-30.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.06%

-44.83%

-21.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.81%

-0.40%

-27.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.18%

-6.70%

-52.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.91%

3.13%

+13.78%

Volatility

GSC vs. DGRS - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) at 3.99%. This indicates that GSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSCDGRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

3.99%

+2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

187.41%

11.29%

+176.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

403.80%

17.91%

+385.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

218.85%

20.38%

+198.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

160.44%

23.61%

+136.83%

GSC vs. DGRS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSC vs. DGRS - Dividend Comparison

GSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than DGRS's 2.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.14%2.68%2.15%2.36%2.88%2.19%2.32%2.39%2.64%1.90%1.82%2.55%
GSC
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF
0.16%0.16%0.66%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSC and DGRS have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSC has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to DGRS (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSC dropped -88.63% vs DGRS's -44.83%.

On 10-year performance, GSC leads with 11.56% vs 10.20% for DGRS. On fees, DGRS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DGRS has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GSC has performed better with a 11.56% return vs 10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSC.

DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.16% for GSC.

GSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DGRS is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GSC and 0.38% for DGRS.

DGRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSC and DGRS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer