PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSAKX vs. GCGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSAKX vs. GCGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSAKX achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than GCGIX's 6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GSAKX has underperformed GCGIX with an annualized return of 10.54%, while GCGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.09% annualized return.


GSAKX

1D
0.38%
1M
4.08%
YTD
10.59%
6M
14.44%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
10.54%

GCGIX

1D
-0.31%
1M
6.79%
YTD
6.18%
6M
5.96%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
28.63%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
18.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSAKX vs. GCGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSAKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A
10.59%33.81%8.50%17.26%-8.28%13.26%2.22%26.54%-12.40%26.04%
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
6.18%15.51%53.44%37.56%-29.62%29.10%32.21%29.70%-4.58%29.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GSAKX and GCGIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between GSAKX and GCGIX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSAKX vs. GCGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSAKX
GSAKX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GSAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GSAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

GCGIX
GCGIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GCGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GCGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSAKX vs. GCGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSAKXGCGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.28

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

1.44

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.27

4.71

+3.55

GSAKX vs. GCGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSAKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the GCGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSAKX and GCGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSAKXGCGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.59

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.76

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.84

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.46

-0.20

Drawdowns

GSAKX vs. GCGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSAKX drawdown since its inception was -56.96%, smaller than the maximum GCGIX drawdown of -65.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAKX and GCGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSAKXGCGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.96%

-65.78%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-17.25%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.18%

-25.10%

+12.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-32.57%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.49%

-32.94%

-1.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-0.31%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

-20.82%

+8.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

5.25%

-2.11%

Volatility

GSAKX vs. GCGIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) at 3.25%. This indicates that GSAKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSAKXGCGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

3.25%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

11.81%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

15.66%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

22.23%

-7.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

21.55%

-5.41%

GSAKX vs. GCGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSAKX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GCGIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSAKX vs. GCGIX - Dividend Comparison

GSAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than GCGIX's 7.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
7.06%7.50%23.16%7.08%19.27%42.43%9.71%4.02%10.10%4.76%0.76%0.87%
GSAKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A
3.39%3.75%2.93%2.68%0.51%2.74%1.73%2.69%15.27%1.41%2.01%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSAKX and GCGIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSAKX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to GCGIX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSAKX dropped -56.96% vs GCGIX's -65.78%.

GSAKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSAKX and GCGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer