GSAKX vs. GCGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX).
GSAKX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jun 25, 2007. GCGIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on May 1, 1997.
Performance
GSAKX vs. GCGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSAKX vs. GCGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSAKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A | 0.47% | 33.81% | 8.50% | 17.26% | -8.28% | 13.26% | 2.22% | 26.54% | -12.40% | 26.04% |
GCGIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund | -14.32% | 15.51% | 53.44% | 37.56% | -29.62% | 29.10% | 32.21% | 29.70% | -4.58% | 29.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSAKX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than GCGIX's -14.32% return. Over the past 10 years, GSAKX has underperformed GCGIX with an annualized return of 9.79%, while GCGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.72% annualized return.
GSAKX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -10.47%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
GCGIX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- -14.32%
- 6M
- -13.58%
- 1Y
- 12.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 15.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSAKX vs. GCGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSAKX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GCGIX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSAKX vs. GCGIX — Risk / Return Rank
GSAKX
GCGIX
GSAKX vs. GCGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSAKX | GCGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 0.54 | +0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 0.94 | +0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.13 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 0.49 | +1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 1.66 | +5.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSAKX | GCGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 0.54 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.59 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.73 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.43 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSAKX and GCGIX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GSAKX vs. GCGIX - Dividend Comparison
GSAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than GCGIX's 8.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSAKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A | 3.73% | 3.75% | 2.93% | 2.68% | 0.51% | 2.74% | 1.73% | 2.69% | 15.27% | 1.41% | 2.01% | 0.77% |
GCGIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund | 8.75% | 7.50% | 23.16% | 7.08% | 19.27% | 42.43% | 9.71% | 4.02% | 10.10% | 4.76% | 0.76% | 0.87% |
Drawdowns
GSAKX vs. GCGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSAKX drawdown since its inception was -56.96%, smaller than the maximum GCGIX drawdown of -65.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAKX and GCGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSAKX | GCGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.96% | -65.78% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -17.25% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.02% | -32.57% | +6.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.49% | -32.94% | -1.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.47% | -17.25% | +6.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.36% | -20.92% | +8.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 5.06% | -2.03% |
Volatility
GSAKX vs. GCGIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) at 5.46%. This indicates that GSAKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSAKX | GCGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 5.46% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.42% | 11.96% | -1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.09% | 22.89% | -6.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 22.19% | -7.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 21.48% | -5.40% |