PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSAKX vs. FISZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSAKX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSAKX achieves a 12.41% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 32.58% return.


GSAKX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.64%
YTD
12.41%
6M
12.25%
1Y
29.64%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
11.49%

FISZX

1D
0.86%
1M
9.84%
YTD
32.58%
6M
33.56%
1Y
49.67%
3Y*
24.72%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSAKX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GSAKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A
12.41%33.81%8.50%17.26%-8.28%13.26%2.22%12.44%
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
32.58%31.77%3.61%15.83%-28.32%9.91%23.49%13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between GSAKX and FISZX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.80

The correlation between GSAKX and FISZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSAKX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSAKX
GSAKX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GSAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GSAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FISZX
FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSAKX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSAKXFISZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.45

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

3.53

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

13.70

-3.92

GSAKX vs. FISZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSAKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the FISZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSAKX and FISZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSAKX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSAKX drawdown since its inception was -56.96%, which is greater than FISZX's maximum drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAKX and FISZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSAKXFISZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.96%

-39.92%

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-14.48%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.18%

-14.63%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-39.92%

+13.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

0.00%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.25%

-12.29%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

3.72%

-0.57%

Volatility

GSAKX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) is 4.10%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 10.30%. This indicates that GSAKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSAKXFISZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

10.30%

-6.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

18.54%

-6.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.84%

20.91%

-6.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

18.30%

-3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

18.52%

-2.42%

GSAKX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSAKX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSAKX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison

GSAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than FISZX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
1.45%1.92%2.55%1.89%1.37%6.08%0.90%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSAKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A
3.33%3.75%2.93%2.68%0.51%2.74%1.73%2.69%15.27%1.41%2.01%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSAKX and FISZX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISZX has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to GSAKX (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSAKX dropped -56.96% vs FISZX's -39.92%.

FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSAKX and FISZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer