PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSAHX vs. GSRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSAHX vs. GSRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund (GSAHX) and Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSAHX achieves a 21.35% return, which is significantly higher than GSRAX's 11.61% return.


GSAHX

1D
1.14%
1M
4.76%
YTD
21.35%
6M
19.93%
1Y
33.38%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*

GSRAX

1D
0.94%
1M
3.97%
YTD
11.61%
6M
11.17%
1Y
18.51%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
12.40%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSAHX vs. GSRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GSAHX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund
21.35%9.13%21.65%18.80%-28.78%8.38%54.70%7.21%
GSRAX
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund
11.61%6.66%26.07%17.49%-7.78%31.47%8.75%5.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GSAHX and GSRAX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019

0.81

The correlation between GSAHX and GSRAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSAHX vs. GSRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSAHX
GSAHX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GSAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
GSAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

GSRAX
GSRAX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GSRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GSRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSAHX vs. GSRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund (GSAHX) and Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSAHXGSRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

2.74

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.19

10.31

+2.87

GSAHX vs. GSRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSAHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the GSRAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSAHX and GSRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSAHXGSRAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.74

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.62

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.49

+0.05

Drawdowns

GSAHX vs. GSRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSAHX drawdown since its inception was -41.67%, smaller than the maximum GSRAX drawdown of -44.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAHX and GSRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSAHXGSRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.67%

-44.40%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.29%

-7.32%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.04%

-25.43%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.67%

-25.43%

-16.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.35%

-6.07%

-8.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

1.94%

+0.74%

Volatility

GSAHX vs. GSRAX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund (GSAHX) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX) at 2.85%. This indicates that GSAHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSAHXGSRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

2.85%

+3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.86%

8.33%

+7.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.61%

11.52%

+9.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.61%

20.21%

+4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.95%

19.87%

+7.08%

GSAHX vs. GSRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GSAHX and GSRAX have an expense ratio of 1.03%.


Dividends

GSAHX vs. GSRAX - Dividend Comparison

GSAHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSAHX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.59%7.28%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSRAX
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund
11.34%12.17%25.88%9.60%14.01%11.55%4.39%11.85%97.89%21.56%3.16%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSAHX and GSRAX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSAHX has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to GSRAX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSAHX dropped -41.67% vs GSRAX's -44.40%.

GSRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSAHX and GSRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer