GS vs. VTIP
GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) is a stock, while VTIP (Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) is Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index. Over the past 10 years, GS returned 25.22%/yr vs 3.03%/yr for VTIP. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GS vs. VTIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a 25.72% return, which is significantly higher than VTIP's 1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has outperformed VTIP with an annualized return of 25.22%, while VTIP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.03% annualized return.
GS
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 10.29%
- YTD
- 25.72%
- 6M
- 22.55%
- 1Y
- 72.59%
- 3Y*
- 55.10%
- 5Y*
- 27.35%
- 10Y*
- 25.22%
VTIP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- 3.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- 3.03%
GS vs. VTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 25.72% | 56.64% | 52.03% | 15.91% | -7.87% | 47.61% | 17.45% | 40.48% | -33.53% | 7.73% |
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.36% | 6.07% | 4.74% | 4.62% | -2.94% | 5.36% | 4.95% | 4.86% | 0.56% | 0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between GS and VTIP is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2012 | -0.01 |
The correlation between GS and VTIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GS vs. VTIP — Risk / Return Rank
GS
VTIP
GS vs. VTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GS | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 5.03 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.47 | 17.90 | -5.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GS vs. VTIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, which is greater than VTIP's maximum drawdown of -6.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and VTIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GS | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.84% | -6.27% | -72.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.42% | -0.71% | -18.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.90% | -0.98% | -29.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.84% | -5.50% | -27.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.75% | -6.27% | -42.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -0.69% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.63% | -1.04% | -21.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 0.20% | +5.64% |
Volatility
GS vs. VTIP - Volatility Comparison
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a higher volatility of 10.15% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) at 0.65%. This indicates that GS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GS | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.15% | 0.65% | +9.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.25% | 1.17% | +22.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.43% | 1.57% | +26.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.04% | 2.77% | +25.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.78% | 2.74% | +27.04% |
Dividends
GS vs. VTIP - Dividend Comparison
GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than VTIP's 3.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.55% | 1.59% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% |
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 3.61% | 3.81% | 2.70% | 2.86% | 6.84% | 4.68% | 1.20% | 1.95% | 2.45% | 1.52% | 0.76% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GS and VTIP have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GS has higher volatility (10.15%) compared to VTIP (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GS dropped -78.84% vs VTIP's -6.27%.
GS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GS and VTIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer