PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GS vs. MSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GS vs. MSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a 22.08% return, which is significantly higher than MSI's 7.83% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has outperformed MSI with an annualized return of 24.48%, while MSI has yielded a comparatively lower 21.65% annualized return.


GS

1D
2.62%
1M
12.54%
YTD
22.08%
6M
20.84%
1Y
76.70%
3Y*
49.31%
5Y*
25.98%
10Y*
24.48%

MSI

1D
0.46%
1M
4.82%
YTD
7.83%
6M
13.71%
1Y
1.85%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
15.56%
10Y*
21.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GS vs. MSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
22.08%56.64%52.03%15.91%-7.87%47.61%17.45%40.48%-33.53%7.73%
MSI
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
7.83%-16.17%49.12%23.04%-3.81%61.90%7.35%42.19%29.64%11.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GS and MSI is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 1999

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between GS and MSI has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GS:

$327.33B

MSI:

$69.26B

EPS

GS:

$57.41

MSI:

$12.42

PE Ratio

GS:

18.51

MSI:

33.20

PEG Ratio

GS:

2.40

MSI:

2.03

PS Ratio

GS:

3.02

MSI:

5.85

PB Ratio

GS:

2.66

MSI:

27.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

GS:

$110.77B

MSI:

$11.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GS:

$61.53B

MSI:

$5.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

GS:

$24.94B

MSI:

$3.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GS vs. MSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GS
GS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
GS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

MSI
MSI Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GS vs. MSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSMSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.03

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

0.04

+3.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.61

0.07

+12.55

GS vs. MSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GS Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the MSI Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GS and MSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GS vs. MSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, smaller than the maximum MSI drawdown of -93.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and MSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSMSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.84%

-93.60%

+14.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.42%

-25.45%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.90%

-27.01%

-3.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.84%

-27.23%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.75%

-32.81%

-15.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-17.00%

+14.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-40.70%

+18.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

13.22%

-7.38%

Volatility

GS vs. MSI - Volatility Comparison

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a higher volatility of 11.84% compared to Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI) at 7.28%. This indicates that GS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSMSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.84%

7.28%

+4.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.47%

19.70%

+3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.55%

23.76%

+4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.10%

23.06%

+5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.87%

25.15%

+4.72%

Dividends

GS vs. MSI - Dividend Comparison

GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than MSI's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
1.60%1.59%2.01%2.72%2.62%1.70%1.90%1.80%1.89%1.14%1.09%1.41%
MSI
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
0.85%1.17%0.87%1.16%1.26%1.07%1.55%1.46%1.85%2.14%2.05%2.09%

Financials

GS vs. MSI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
17.23B
2.71B
(GS) Total Revenue
(MSI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GS vs. MSI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
98.2%
50.2%
Portfolio components
GS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.91B and revenue of 17.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.2%.

MSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Motorola Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.2%.

GS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.49B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.7%.

MSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Motorola Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 525.00M and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.3%.

GS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 5.63B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.

MSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Motorola Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 368.00M and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GS and MSI have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GS has higher volatility (11.84%) compared to MSI (7.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GS dropped -78.84% vs MSI's -93.60%.

GS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GS and MSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer