PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GS vs. HG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GS vs. HG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. (HG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GS having a 22.08% return and HG slightly higher at 22.35%.


GS

1D
2.62%
1M
12.54%
YTD
22.08%
6M
20.84%
1Y
76.70%
3Y*
49.31%
5Y*
25.98%
10Y*
24.48%

HG

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.19%
YTD
22.35%
6M
21.31%
1Y
61.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GS vs. HG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
22.08%56.64%52.03%21.25%
HG
Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd.
22.35%46.61%27.29%-1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GS and HG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2023

0.20

Fundamentals

EPS

GS:

$57.41

HG:

$8.27

PE Ratio

GS:

18.51

HG:

3.86

PEG Ratio

GS:

2.40

HG:

0.07

PS Ratio

GS:

3.02

HG:

0.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

GS:

$110.77B

HG:

$2.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GS:

$61.53B

HG:

$1.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

GS:

$24.94B

HG:

$1.36B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GS vs. HG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GS
GS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
GS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

HG
HG Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HG Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HG Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GS vs. HG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. (HG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

4.72

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.61

16.71

-4.09

GS vs. HG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GS Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the HG Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GS and HG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GS vs. HG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, which is greater than HG's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and HG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.84%

-21.07%

-57.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.42%

-12.69%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-2.71%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-5.42%

-17.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

3.58%

+2.26%

Volatility

GS vs. HG - Volatility Comparison

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a higher volatility of 11.84% compared to Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. (HG) at 8.69%. This indicates that GS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.84%

8.69%

+3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.47%

18.52%

+4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.55%

27.89%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.10%

31.39%

-3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.87%

31.39%

-1.52%

Dividends

GS vs. HG - Dividend Comparison

GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than HG's 6.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
1.60%1.59%2.01%2.72%2.62%1.70%1.90%1.80%1.89%1.14%1.09%1.41%
HG
Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd.
6.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GS vs. HG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
17.23B
758.91M
(GS) Total Revenue
(HG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GS vs. HG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
98.2%
99.5%
Portfolio components
GS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.91B and revenue of 17.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.2%.

HG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 754.89M and revenue of 758.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.5%.

GS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.49B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.7%.

HG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 693.42M and revenue of 758.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 91.4%.

GS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 5.63B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.

HG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd. reported a net income of 133.54M and revenue of 758.91M, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GS and HG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GS has higher volatility (11.84%) compared to HG (8.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GS dropped -78.84% vs HG's -21.07%.

GS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GS and HG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer