PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GS vs. EQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GS vs. EQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Equinix, Inc. (EQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a 23.62% return, which is significantly lower than EQIX's 40.37% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has outperformed EQIX with an annualized return of 24.68%, while EQIX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.17% annualized return.


GS

1D
1.26%
1M
13.96%
YTD
23.62%
6M
22.15%
1Y
78.93%
3Y*
50.55%
5Y*
26.77%
10Y*
24.68%

EQIX

1D
0.81%
1M
0.96%
YTD
40.37%
6M
41.25%
1Y
21.95%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
13.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GS vs. EQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
23.62%56.64%52.03%15.91%-7.87%47.61%17.45%40.48%-33.53%7.73%
EQIX
Equinix, Inc.
40.37%-16.88%19.45%25.41%-21.13%20.28%24.22%68.86%-20.41%29.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GS and EQIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2000

0.29

The correlation between GS and EQIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (10 years) to 0.36 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GS:

$331.46B

EQIX:

$105.08B

EPS

GS:

$57.41

EQIX:

$14.46

PE Ratio

GS:

18.75

EQIX:

73.60

PEG Ratio

GS:

2.43

EQIX:

2.52

PS Ratio

GS:

3.06

EQIX:

11.07

PB Ratio

GS:

2.69

EQIX:

7.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

GS:

$110.77B

EQIX:

$9.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GS:

$61.53B

EQIX:

$4.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

GS:

$24.94B

EQIX:

$3.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GS vs. EQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GS
GS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GS Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EQIX
EQIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
EQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GS vs. EQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Equinix, Inc. (EQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSEQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.19

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

1.17

+2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.56

2.10

+11.45

GS vs. EQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GS Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the EQIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GS and EQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GS vs. EQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, smaller than the maximum EQIX drawdown of -99.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and EQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.84%

-99.44%

+20.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.42%

-18.93%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.90%

-24.59%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.84%

-41.77%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.75%

-41.77%

-6.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-4.09%

+2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.64%

-52.60%

+29.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

10.45%

-4.61%

Volatility

GS vs. EQIX - Volatility Comparison

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to Equinix, Inc. (EQIX) at 5.61%. This indicates that GS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.83%

5.61%

+6.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.39%

16.82%

+6.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.55%

26.22%

+2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.11%

27.66%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.88%

27.15%

+2.73%

Dividends

GS vs. EQIX - Dividend Comparison

GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than EQIX's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQIX
Equinix, Inc.
1.85%2.45%1.81%1.80%1.89%1.36%1.49%1.69%2.59%1.77%1.96%5.86%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
1.58%1.59%2.01%2.72%2.62%1.70%1.90%1.80%1.89%1.14%1.09%1.41%

Financials

GS vs. EQIX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Equinix, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
17.23B
2.44B
(GS) Total Revenue
(EQIX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GS vs. EQIX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Equinix, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
98.2%
51.5%
Portfolio components
GS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.91B and revenue of 17.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.2%.

EQIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.5%.

GS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.49B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.7%.

EQIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinix, Inc. reported an operating income of 577.00M and revenue of 2.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.6%.

GS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 5.63B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.

EQIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinix, Inc. reported a net income of 415.00M and revenue of 2.44B, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GS and EQIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GS has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to EQIX (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GS dropped -78.84% vs EQIX's -99.44%.

GS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GS and EQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer