GRW vs. OUSA
Compare and contrast key facts about TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA).
GRW and OUSA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GRW is an actively managed fund by TCW. It was launched on May 6, 2024. OUSA is a passively managed fund by O'Shares Investments that tracks the performance of the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. It was launched on Jul 14, 2015.
Performance
GRW vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GRW vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | -10.76% | -5.07% | 11.08% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | -3.08% | 10.23% | 10.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRW achieves a -10.76% return, which is significantly lower than OUSA's -3.08% return.
GRW
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- -10.76%
- 6M
- -13.16%
- 1Y
- -16.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OUSA
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- YTD
- -3.08%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- 1Y
- 6.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GRW vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GRW vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank
GRW
OUSA
GRW vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRW | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | 0.48 | -1.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | 0.79 | -2.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.11 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 0.64 | -1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.61 | 2.59 | -4.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRW | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 | 0.48 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.20 | 0.66 | -0.87 |
Correlation
The correlation between GRW and OUSA is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GRW vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison
GRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than OUSA's 1.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 0.30% | 0.27% | 11.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.46% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
Drawdowns
GRW vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRW drawdown since its inception was -23.84%, smaller than the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRW and OUSA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRW | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.84% | -33.12% | +9.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.84% | -9.80% | -14.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.01% | -6.57% | -14.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -3.54% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.96% | 2.42% | +7.54% |
Volatility
GRW vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison
TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.78%. This indicates that GRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GRW | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 3.78% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.79% | 7.25% | +3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.98% | 13.83% | +4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 13.31% | +2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 15.14% | +1.07% |