PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRT-UN.TO vs. G
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GRT-UN.TO vs. G - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) and Genpact Limited (G). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GRT-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while G is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the G values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRT-UN.TO achieves a 19.72% return, which is significantly higher than G's -28.60% return. Over the past 10 years, GRT-UN.TO has outperformed G with an annualized return of 14.48%, while G has yielded a comparatively lower 3.61% annualized return.


GRT-UN.TO

1D
0.22%
1M
3.25%
YTD
19.72%
6M
28.31%
1Y
41.14%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
14.48%

G

1D
0.75%
1M
2.33%
YTD
-28.60%
6M
-27.82%
1Y
-21.76%
3Y*
-1.82%
5Y*
-2.39%
10Y*
3.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRT-UN.TO vs. G - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
19.72%22.80%-4.30%15.18%-31.88%40.16%22.56%29.65%14.45%15.87%
G
Genpact Limited
-28.57%5.51%36.43%-25.79%-6.14%29.45%-3.28%51.16%-6.90%22.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GRT-UN.TO and G is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2007

0.19

The correlation between GRT-UN.TO and G shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$5.83B

G:

$5.64B

EPS

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$6.39

G:

$3.25

PE Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

15.07

G:

10.04

PEG Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

0.93

G:

0.56

PS Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

9.32

G:

1.11

PB Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

1.04

G:

2.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$629.87M

G:

$5.16B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$517.51M

G:

$1.87B

EBITDA (TTM)

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$513.85M

G:

$844.98M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRT-UN.TO vs. G — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRT-UN.TO
GRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

G
G Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
G Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
G Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
G Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
G Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRT-UN.TO vs. G - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) and Genpact Limited (G). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRT-UN.TOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.90

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

-0.54

+3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

-1.32

+11.61

GRT-UN.TO vs. G - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the G Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRT-UN.TO and G, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRT-UN.TOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

-0.62

+2.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

-0.08

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.13

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.24

+0.10

Drawdowns

GRT-UN.TO vs. G - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.48%, which is greater than G's maximum drawdown of -54.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRT-UN.TO and G.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRT-UN.TOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.48%

-54.16%

-33.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.91%

-40.41%

+27.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.99%

-49.06%

+21.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.82%

-49.06%

+11.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.89%

-49.06%

+4.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-41.54%

+40.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.98%

-14.08%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

16.48%

-12.47%

Volatility

GRT-UN.TO vs. G - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) is 5.88%, while Genpact Limited (G) has a volatility of 13.67%. This indicates that GRT-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRT-UN.TOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.88%

13.67%

-7.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.87%

27.44%

-12.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

35.26%

-16.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.88%

29.29%

-7.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.44%

28.83%

-6.39%

Dividends

GRT-UN.TO vs. G - Dividend Comparison

GRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than G's 2.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
G
Genpact Limited
2.14%1.45%1.42%1.58%1.08%0.81%0.94%0.81%1.11%0.76%0.00%0.00%
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
3.61%4.18%4.74%4.21%4.50%2.86%3.43%4.25%5.69%5.31%5.42%1.62%

Financials

GRT-UN.TO vs. G - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Real Estate Investment Trust and Genpact Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
165.83M
1.30B
(GRT-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(G) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GRT-UN.TO values in CAD, G values in USD

GRT-UN.TO vs. G - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Granite Real Estate Investment Trust and Genpact Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
81.0%
36.4%
Portfolio components
GRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 134.27M and revenue of 165.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.

G - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genpact Limited reported a gross profit of 471.67M and revenue of 1.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.

GRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 122.29M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 73.7%.

G - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genpact Limited reported an operating income of 198.58M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

GRT-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 91.25M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in a net margin of 55.0%.

G - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genpact Limited reported a net income of 147.99M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GRT-UN.TO and G have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRT-UN.TO and G

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer