GROZ vs. MLPI

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

GROZ (Zacks Focus Growth ETF) and MLPI (NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GROZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Zacks, while MLPI is a MLPs fund actively managed by NEOS. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. GROZ charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.

Performance

GROZ vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Focus Growth ETF (GROZ) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GROZ achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly lower than MLPI's 18.32% return.

GROZ

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 7.53%
• 6M: 7.15%
• 1Y: 27.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPI

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: -3.23%
• YTD: 18.32%
• 6M: 17.87%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GROZ vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GROZ Zacks Focus Growth ETF	7.53%	2.31%
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	18.32%	0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between GROZ and MLPI is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	-0.21

Return for Risk

GROZ vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GROZ

GROZ Risk / Return Rank: 47
GROZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
GROZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
GROZ Omega Ratio Rank: 48
GROZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GROZ Martin Ratio Rank: 45

MLPI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GROZ vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Focus Growth ETF (GROZ) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GROZ	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.25	—	—

Drawdowns

GROZ vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GROZ drawdown since its inception was -23.33%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GROZ and MLPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GROZ	MLPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.33%	-5.38%	-17.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	-3.23%	+1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.02%	-1.49%	-2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.75%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GROZ	MLPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.05%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.73%	13.04%	+2.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.92%	13.04%	+8.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.92%	13.04%	+8.88%

GROZ vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GROZ has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

GROZ vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

GROZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than MLPI's 7.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GROZ Zacks Focus Growth ETF	0.04%	0.04%
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	7.27%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GROZ and MLPI in my portfolio?

GROZ and MLPI have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GROZ or MLPI?

On fees, GROZ is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GROZ or MLPI?

GROZ is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GROZ or MLPI?

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.27%, compared with 0.04% for GROZ.

What is the main difference between GROZ and MLPI?

GROZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MLPI is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Zacks and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for GROZ and 0.68% for MLPI.