PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GROZ vs. IOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GROZ vs. IOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Focus Growth ETF (GROZ) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GROZ achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's 7.16% return.


GROZ

1D
-0.35%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
4.53%
6M
2.66%
1Y
20.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IOO

1D
-0.21%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
7.16%
6M
6.45%
1Y
29.33%
3Y*
23.03%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*
16.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GROZ vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GROZ
Zacks Focus Growth ETF
4.53%20.28%-1.80%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
7.16%27.02%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GROZ and IOO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024

0.92

The correlation between GROZ and IOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GROZ vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GROZ
GROZ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GROZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GROZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
GROZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GROZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GROZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

IOO
IOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GROZ vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Focus Growth ETF (GROZ) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GROZIOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.37

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

2.97

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.54

12.57

-7.03

GROZ vs. IOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GROZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the IOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GROZ and IOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GROZ vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GROZ drawdown since its inception was -23.33%, smaller than the maximum IOO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GROZ and IOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GROZIOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.33%

-55.85%

+32.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.67%

-9.94%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.74%

-5.81%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-11.25%

+7.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

2.34%

+1.43%

Volatility

GROZ vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison

Zacks Focus Growth ETF (GROZ) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) have volatilities of 5.24% and 5.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GROZIOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

5.30%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.90%

11.46%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.77%

14.25%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.88%

17.17%

+4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

17.73%

+4.15%

GROZ vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GROZ has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GROZ vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison

GROZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than IOO's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GROZ
Zacks Focus Growth ETF
0.04%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
0.86%0.92%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GROZ and IOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IOO has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to GROZ (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GROZ dropped -23.33% vs IOO's -55.85%.

On 1-year performance, IOO leads with 29.33% vs 20.84% for GROZ. On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IOO has performed better with a 29.33% return vs 20.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for GROZ.

IOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.04% for GROZ.

GROZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IOO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Zacks and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for GROZ and 0.40% for IOO.

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GROZ and IOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer