PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GROZ vs. DARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GROZ vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Focus Growth ETF (GROZ) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GROZ achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 21.09% return.


GROZ

1D
1.05%
1M
0.35%
6M
7.14%
YTD
6.71%
1Y
19.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.05%

DARP

1D
2.96%
1M
-3.88%
6M
9.77%
YTD
21.09%
1Y
49.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
31.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$346.01K$294.81K$497.24K
$651.92K$629.68K$919.30K

GROZ vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GROZ
Zacks Focus Growth ETF
6.71%20.28%-1.80%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
21.09%40.19%-3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GROZ and DARP is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024

0.83

The correlation between GROZ and DARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GROZ vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GROZ
GROZ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GROZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GROZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GROZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GROZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GROZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GROZ vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Focus Growth ETF (GROZ) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GROZDARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

2.92

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.35

11.11

-6.75

GROZ vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GROZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the DARP Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GROZ and DARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GROZ vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GROZ drawdown since its inception was -23.33%, smaller than the maximum DARP drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GROZ and DARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GROZDARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.33%

-30.27%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.67%

-15.76%

+2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-9.42%

+6.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-4.72%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

4.14%

-0.22%

Volatility

GROZ vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zacks Focus Growth ETF (GROZ) is 5.70%, while Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a volatility of 9.87%. This indicates that GROZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GROZDARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

9.87%

-4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.84%

21.44%

-8.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.56%

26.87%

-10.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.72%

26.83%

-5.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.72%

26.83%

-5.11%

GROZ vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GROZ has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GROZ vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

GROZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than DARP's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.36%0.43%1.93%0.32%
GROZ
Zacks Focus Growth ETF
0.04%0.04%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GROZ and DARP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DARP has higher volatility (9.87%) compared to GROZ (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GROZ dropped -23.33% vs DARP's -30.27%.

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 49.32% vs 19.14% for GROZ. On fees, GROZ is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, GROZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 49.32% return vs 19.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GROZ is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

DARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.04% for GROZ.

They also come from different issuers: Zacks and Grizzle. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for GROZ and 0.75% for DARP.

DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GROZ and DARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer