GRNY vs. AFOS
GRNY (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GRNY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
GRNY vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRNY achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.
GRNY
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 29.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.94%
- YTD
- 32.04%
- 6M
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRNY vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF | 11.15% | 10.78% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 32.04% | 36.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRNY and AFOS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRNY vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
GRNY
AFOS
GRNY vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRNY | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRNY | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 4.35 | -3.39 |
Drawdowns
GRNY vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNY drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNY and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRNY | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.18% | -11.52% | -12.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -0.29% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.03% | -1.37% | -2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | — | — |
Volatility
GRNY vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRNY | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.59% | 20.19% | -2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.19% | 20.19% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.19% | 20.19% | +3.00% |
GRNY vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRNY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRNY vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
GRNY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% |
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRNY and AFOS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNY.
AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.00% for GRNY.
They also come from different issuers: Tidal ETFs and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRNY and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for GRNY and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer