GRNJ vs. SIXL
GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) and SIXL (ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. GRNJ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SIXL.
Performance
GRNJ vs. SIXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRNJ achieves a 16.81% return, which is significantly higher than SIXL's 10.74% return.
GRNJ
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- 6M
- 8.17%
- YTD
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIXL
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 9.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- —
GRNJ vs. SIXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 16.81% | 6.02% |
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF | 10.74% | -0.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRNJ and SIXL is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRNJ vs. SIXL — Risk / Return Rank
GRNJ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SIXL
GRNJ vs. SIXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRNJ | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRNJ vs. SIXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNJ drawdown since its inception was -17.32%, which is greater than SIXL's maximum drawdown of -16.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNJ and SIXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRNJ | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.32% | -16.08% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -0.83% | -7.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -4.53% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.45% | — |
Volatility
GRNJ vs. SIXL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRNJ | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.50% | 10.23% | +20.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 12.25% | +18.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 12.59% | +17.91% |
GRNJ vs. SIXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRNJ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SIXL's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRNJ vs. SIXL - Dividend Comparison
GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF | 2.19% | 2.31% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.45% | 0.67% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRNJ and SIXL have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SIXL is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SIXL is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.
SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.
They also come from different issuers: Fundstrat and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRNJ and 0.47% for SIXL.
Find the right allocation for GRNJ and SIXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer