GRNJ vs. IVES
GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) and IVES (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRNJ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fundstrat, while IVES is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. GRNJ is actively managed, while IVES is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
GRNJ vs. IVES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRNJ achieves a 25.40% return, which is significantly higher than IVES's 15.94% return.
GRNJ
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 25.40%
- 6M
- 20.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVES
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 15.94%
- 6M
- 13.43%
- 1Y
- 40.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRNJ vs. IVES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 25.40% | 6.02% |
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 15.94% | -0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRNJ and IVES is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRNJ vs. IVES — Risk / Return Rank
GRNJ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IVES
GRNJ vs. IVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRNJ | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRNJ vs. IVES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNJ drawdown since its inception was -17.32%, smaller than the maximum IVES drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNJ and IVES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRNJ | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.32% | -22.64% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -12.17% | +10.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -5.83% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.28% | — |
Volatility
GRNJ vs. IVES - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRNJ | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.75% | 27.10% | +3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.75% | 26.66% | +4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.75% | 26.66% | +4.09% |
GRNJ vs. IVES - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GRNJ and IVES have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
GRNJ vs. IVES - Dividend Comparison
GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 0.36% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRNJ and IVES have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GRNJ and IVES have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
IVES has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.
GRNJ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IVES is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fundstrat and Wedbush.
Find the right allocation for GRNJ and IVES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer