GRNI vs. GPIQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GRNI (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRNI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Tidal, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GRNI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.

Performance

GRNI vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNI achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 18.30% return.

GRNI

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 3.46%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 6M: 8.72%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GPIQ

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 8.51%
• YTD: 18.30%
• 6M: 17.64%
• 1Y: 37.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRNI vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GRNI Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF	9.53%	2.85%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	18.30%	3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GRNI and GPIQ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

GRNI vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIQ

GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 81
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 82
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNI vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GRNI	GPIQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	1.78	-0.33

Drawdowns

GRNI vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNI drawdown since its inception was -9.55%, smaller than the maximum GPIQ drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNI and GPIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRNI	GPIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.55%	-21.06%	+11.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-0.19%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.12%	-2.27%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GRNI	GPIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.44%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.34%	13.40%	+3.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.34%	17.47%	-0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.34%	17.47%	-0.13%

GRNI vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRNI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

GRNI vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

GRNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than GPIQ's 9.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	9.32%	9.81%	9.18%	1.74%
GRNI Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF	4.79%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRNI and GPIQ in my portfolio?

GRNI and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GRNI or GPIQ?

On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GRNI or GPIQ?

GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GRNI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GRNI or GPIQ?

GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 4.79% for GRNI.

What is the main difference between GRNI and GPIQ?

GRNI is categorized as Derivative Income, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GRNI and 0.29% for GPIQ.