PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRNB vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRNB vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNB achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 68.39% return.


GRNB

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.28%
6M
0.21%
YTD
0.48%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
0.60%
10Y*

DBE

1D
-1.09%
1M
6.25%
6M
65.69%
YTD
68.39%
1Y
57.64%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
17.10%
10Y*
11.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRNB vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
0.48%7.09%3.31%7.08%-11.93%-2.36%7.98%5.40%-4.07%9.87%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
68.39%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%13.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GRNB and DBE is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2017

-0.08

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GRNB and DBE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.08 to -0.42, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRNB vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNB
GRNB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GRNB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRNB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRNB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GRNB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRNB Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNB vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRNBDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

2.34

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

7.00

-1.06

GRNB vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRNB Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRNB and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRNB vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNB drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNB and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRNBDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.08%

-86.69%

+68.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-24.72%

+22.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.24%

-24.72%

+20.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.94%

-38.74%

+20.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-36.07%

+35.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-57.19%

+52.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

8.26%

-7.61%

Volatility

GRNB vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) is 0.83%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 11.68%. This indicates that GRNB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRNBDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

11.68%

-10.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.49%

32.70%

-30.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01%

35.99%

-32.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.91%

29.88%

-24.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.86%

28.39%

-23.53%

GRNB vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRNB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRNB vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

GRNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than DBE's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.29%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%0.00%
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
4.39%4.18%3.83%3.17%2.60%1.97%2.24%1.79%1.21%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRNB and DBE have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (11.68%) compared to GRNB (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRNB dropped -18.08% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 17.10% vs 0.60% for GRNB. On fees, GRNB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GRNB has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 17.10% return vs 0.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GRNB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

GRNB has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 2.29% for DBE.

GRNB is categorized as Global Bonds, while DBE is Oil & Gas. GRNB tracks S&P Green Bond U.S. Dollar Select Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GRNB and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRNB and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer