GRN vs. RSBY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GRN (iPath Series B Carbon ETN) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRN is a Commodities fund tracking the Barclays Global Carbon II Index, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. GRN is passively managed, while RSBY is actively managed. Over the past year, GRN returned 9.03% vs 20.50% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. GRN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.

Performance

GRN vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRN achieves a -8.60% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 18.98% return.

GRN

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 8.55%
• YTD: -8.60%
• 6M: -4.48%
• 1Y: 9.03%
• 3Y*: 0.39%
• 5Y*: 9.52%
• 10Y*: —

RSBY

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -2.54%
• YTD: 18.98%
• 6M: 14.31%
• 1Y: 20.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRN vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GRN iPath Series B Carbon ETN	-8.60%	20.33%	-0.98%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	18.98%	-12.98%	-7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between GRN and RSBY is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024	-0.09

The correlation between GRN and RSBY shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GRN vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRN

GRN Risk / Return Rank: 13
GRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
GRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
GRN Omega Ratio Rank: 14
GRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
GRN Martin Ratio Rank: 13

RSBY

RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 49
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 48
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRN vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GRN	RSBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	1.75	-1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	2.54	-1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.30	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	2.59	-2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.77	6.07	-5.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GRN vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRN and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GRN	RSBY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33	1.75	-1.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	-0.20	+0.61

Drawdowns

GRN vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRN drawdown since its inception was -47.96%, which is greater than RSBY's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRN and RSBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRN	RSBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.96%	-23.32%	-24.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.39%	-7.95%	-22.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.73%	-6.09%	-13.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.54%	-13.79%	-3.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.83%	3.39%	+8.44%

Volatility

GRN vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 2.11%. This indicates that GRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRN	RSBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.65%	2.11%	+4.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.47%	8.52%	+15.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.74%	11.80%	+15.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.82%	13.56%	+26.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.95%	13.56%	+28.39%

GRN vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

GRN vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

GRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GRN iPath Series B Carbon ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	1.74%	2.07%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRN and RSBY in my portfolio?

GRN and RSBY have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GRN or RSBY?

GRN has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to RSBY (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRN dropped -47.96% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, GRN or RSBY?

On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 20.50% vs 9.03% for GRN. On fees, GRN is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 2.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GRN or RSBY?

Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 20.50% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GRN or RSBY?

GRN is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GRN or RSBY?

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for GRN.

What is the main difference between GRN and RSBY?

GRN is categorized as Commodities, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRN and 0.98% for RSBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.