GRMRX vs. SWPPX
GRMRX (Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R) and SWPPX (Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - GRMRX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while SWPPX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GRMRX returned 14.67%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SWPPX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GRMRX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SWPPX.
Performance
GRMRX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GRMRX having a 9.75% return and SWPPX slightly higher at 10.15%. Over the past 10 years, GRMRX has underperformed SWPPX with an annualized return of 14.67%, while SWPPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.
GRMRX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 26.14%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.67%
SWPPX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 27.14%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.08%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
GRMRX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRMRX Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R | 9.75% | 16.90% | 23.49% | 25.00% | -18.86% | 27.62% | 17.38% | 30.41% | -4.21% | 20.78% |
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund | 10.15% | 17.87% | 24.96% | 26.26% | -18.14% | 28.67% | 18.38% | 31.46% | -4.47% | 21.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRMRX and SWPPX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 1.00 |
The correlation between GRMRX and SWPPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRMRX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank
GRMRX
SWPPX
GRMRX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R (GRMRX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRMRX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 3.04 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.93 | 13.71 | -0.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRMRX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRMRX drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRMRX and SWPPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRMRX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.25% | -55.06% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -8.89% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.84% | -18.74% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -24.51% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.87% | -33.80% | -0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -1.38% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -9.93% | +2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 1.97% | +0.04% |
Volatility
GRMRX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R (GRMRX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRMRX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 4.83% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 9.94% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 12.50% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 17.03% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 18.27% | -0.15% |
GRMRX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRMRX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRMRX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison
GRMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than SWPPX's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRMRX Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class R | 4.31% | 4.74% | 2.21% | 0.47% | 1.20% | 4.63% | 0.86% | 5.98% | 18.24% | 6.42% | 7.16% | 11.57% |
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund | 1.01% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.43% | 1.67% | 1.27% | 1.81% | 1.95% | 2.67% | 1.79% | 2.55% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, GRMRX and SWPPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SWPPX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to GRMRX (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRMRX dropped -52.25% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.
SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRMRX and SWPPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer