PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRISX vs. NDMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRISX vs. NDMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund (GRISX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRISX achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly higher than NDMAX's 9.92% return. Over the past 10 years, GRISX has outperformed NDMAX with an annualized return of 15.19%, while NDMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.04% annualized return.


GRISX

1D
-0.73%
1M
4.17%
YTD
10.73%
6M
10.63%
1Y
27.62%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
15.19%

NDMAX

1D
-0.66%
1M
2.72%
YTD
9.92%
6M
10.73%
1Y
22.82%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
9.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRISX vs. NDMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRISX
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund
10.73%17.41%24.13%25.55%-18.49%28.32%17.92%30.94%-3.84%21.35%
NDMAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund
9.92%15.92%12.14%18.16%-17.78%14.69%12.86%19.67%-8.68%15.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GRISX and NDMAX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2000

0.95

The correlation between GRISX and NDMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRISX vs. NDMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRISX
GRISX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GRISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRISX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GRISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRISX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

NDMAX
NDMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NDMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NDMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRISX vs. NDMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund (GRISX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRISXNDMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.01

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.46

12.90

+1.56

GRISX vs. NDMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the NDMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRISX and NDMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRISXNDMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.27

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.57

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.63

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.39

+0.05

Drawdowns

GRISX vs. NDMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRISX drawdown since its inception was -55.53%, which is greater than NDMAX's maximum drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRISX and NDMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRISXNDMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.53%

-47.85%

-7.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-7.75%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-13.33%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.75%

-27.51%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

-33.00%

-0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.66%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-8.18%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.80%

+0.11%

Volatility

GRISX vs. NDMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund (GRISX) is 2.93%, while Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) has a volatility of 3.25%. This indicates that GRISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRISXNDMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

3.25%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

8.33%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

10.28%

+1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

13.65%

+3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

14.48%

+3.60%

GRISX vs. NDMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRISX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than NDMAX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRISX vs. NDMAX - Dividend Comparison

GRISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than NDMAX's 8.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRISX
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund
4.62%5.08%2.62%0.79%1.67%4.96%1.27%6.26%18.54%6.66%7.42%11.98%
NDMAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund
8.49%9.28%16.19%6.30%3.88%5.83%5.68%8.26%14.63%10.61%8.26%7.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GRISX and NDMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NDMAX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to GRISX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRISX dropped -55.53% vs NDMAX's -47.85%.

GRISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRISX and NDMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer