GRIFX vs. HLRRX
GRIFX (Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I) and HLRRX (LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 10 years, GRIFX returned 4.49%/yr vs 5.01%/yr for HLRRX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRIFX charges 2.23%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for HLRRX.
Performance
GRIFX vs. HLRRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRIFX achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly lower than HLRRX's 15.25% return. Over the past 10 years, GRIFX has underperformed HLRRX with an annualized return of 4.49%, while HLRRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.01% annualized return.
GRIFX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 3.74%
- 6M
- 3.83%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
HLRRX
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 16.52%
- 1Y
- 11.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- 5.01%
GRIFX vs. HLRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRIFX Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I | 3.74% | 1.14% | 3.78% | -3.05% | -1.17% | 22.08% | -2.69% | 8.38% | 4.97% | 6.73% |
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 15.25% | -9.13% | 9.45% | 10.50% | -21.40% | 40.50% | -3.78% | 31.75% | -13.63% | -1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRIFX and HLRRX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2015 | 0.79 |
The correlation between GRIFX and HLRRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRIFX vs. HLRRX — Risk / Return Rank
GRIFX
HLRRX
GRIFX vs. HLRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I (GRIFX) and LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRIFX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 1.87 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.64 | 4.24 | +2.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRIFX vs. HLRRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRIFX drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum HLRRX drawdown of -62.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRIFX and HLRRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRIFX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -62.78% | +48.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.70% | -6.72% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.28% | -21.04% | +13.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.29% | -28.99% | +14.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.29% | -48.13% | +33.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -2.85% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -8.48% | +5.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 2.96% | -2.27% |
Volatility
GRIFX vs. HLRRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I (GRIFX) is 1.17%, while LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that GRIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRIFX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 3.48% | -2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 8.22% | -5.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.71% | 12.61% | -8.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.51% | 17.38% | -11.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.62% | 20.82% | -16.20% |
GRIFX vs. HLRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRIFX has a 2.23% expense ratio, which is higher than HLRRX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRIFX vs. HLRRX - Dividend Comparison
GRIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, less than HLRRX's 9.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRIFX Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I | 7.81% | 5.37% | 5.27% | 5.46% | 4.14% | 3.67% | 5.26% | 5.27% | 5.29% | 5.22% | 5.27% | 2.62% |
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 9.50% | 9.39% | 4.93% | 5.50% | 13.71% | 17.02% | 9.10% | 2.44% | 2.68% | 17.61% | 15.94% | 10.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRIFX and HLRRX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLRRX has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to GRIFX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRIFX dropped -14.29% vs HLRRX's -62.78%.
GRIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRIFX and HLRRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer