GRIFX vs. CREMX
GRIFX (Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I) and CREMX (Redwood Real Estate Income Fund) are both REIT funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GRIFX returned 4.19% vs 7.47% for CREMX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. GRIFX charges 2.23%/yr vs 5.16%/yr for CREMX.
Performance
GRIFX vs. CREMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRIFX achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly higher than CREMX's 3.39% return.
GRIFX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 3.74%
- 6M
- 3.83%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
CREMX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 3.58%
- 1Y
- 7.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRIFX vs. CREMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GRIFX Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I | 3.74% | 1.14% | 3.78% | 0.02% |
CREMX Redwood Real Estate Income Fund | 3.39% | 7.72% | 8.09% | 1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRIFX and CREMX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2023 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRIFX vs. CREMX — Risk / Return Rank
GRIFX
CREMX
GRIFX vs. CREMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I (GRIFX) and Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRIFX | CREMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -181.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 183.38 | -182.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 191.47 | -188.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.64 | 3,021.27 | -3,014.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRIFX vs. CREMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRIFX drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, which is greater than CREMX's maximum drawdown of -0.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRIFX and CREMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRIFX | CREMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -0.71% | -13.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.70% | -0.04% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | 0.00% | -2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -0.02% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 0.00% | +0.69% |
Volatility
GRIFX vs. CREMX - Volatility Comparison
Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I (GRIFX) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX) at 0.11%. This indicates that GRIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CREMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRIFX | CREMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 0.11% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 0.30% | +2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.71% | 0.43% | +3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.51% | 0.86% | +4.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.62% | 0.86% | +3.76% |
GRIFX vs. CREMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRIFX has a 2.23% expense ratio, which is lower than CREMX's 5.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRIFX vs. CREMX - Dividend Comparison
GRIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than CREMX's 7.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CREMX Redwood Real Estate Income Fund | 7.11% | 7.38% | 7.64% | 1.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GRIFX Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I | 7.81% | 5.37% | 5.27% | 5.46% | 4.14% | 3.67% | 5.26% | 5.27% | 5.29% | 5.22% | 5.27% | 2.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRIFX and CREMX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRIFX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to CREMX (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRIFX dropped -14.29% vs CREMX's -0.71%.
CREMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.85 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRIFX and CREMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer