GRID vs. XLV
GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GRID returned 19.71%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for XLV. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GRID charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
GRID vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 25.84% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, GRID has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 19.71%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.89% annualized return.
GRID
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 25.84%
- 6M
- 25.25%
- 1Y
- 45.78%
- 3Y*
- 23.73%
- 5Y*
- 17.31%
- 10Y*
- 19.71%
XLV
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- -1.24%
- 1Y
- 14.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
GRID vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 25.84% | 29.65% | 15.18% | 21.57% | -13.89% | 27.65% | 48.84% | 42.80% | -22.69% | 27.44% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.83% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRID and XLV is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GRID and XLV has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
GRID vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GRID
XLV
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
GRID
XLV
-
Technology
GRID
XLV
-
Utilities
GRID
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
GRID
XLV
-
Energy
GRID
XLV
-
Basic Materials
GRID
XLV
-
Communication Services
GRID
-
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
GRID
-
XLV
-
Financial Services
GRID
-
XLV
-
Healthcare
GRID
-
XLV
Real Estate
GRID
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRID vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
GRID
XLV
GRID vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRID | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.17 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 1.37 | +2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.11 | 3.28 | +10.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRID vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, roughly equal to the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRID | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -39.17% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -10.47% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -17.11% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -17.11% | -12.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | -28.40% | -12.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -4.17% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -7.12% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 4.37% | -1.12% |
Volatility
GRID vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 4.96%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRID | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.77% | 4.96% | +4.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.77% | 10.58% | +7.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.78% | 15.05% | +5.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 14.75% | +6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 16.58% | +6.30% |
GRID vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRID vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than XLV's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 0.78% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.64% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRID and XLV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRID has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to XLV (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 19.71% vs 9.89% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 19.71% return vs 9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.78% for GRID.
GRID is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.08% for XLV.
GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRID and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer