PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRID vs. XLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRID vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 25.84% return, which is significantly higher than XLP's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GRID has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 19.71%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.58% annualized return.


GRID

1D
1.82%
1M
0.35%
YTD
25.84%
6M
25.25%
1Y
45.78%
3Y*
23.73%
5Y*
17.31%
10Y*
19.71%

XLP

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.99%
YTD
10.66%
6M
8.80%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
7.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRID vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
25.84%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
10.66%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GRID and XLP is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.39

The correlation between GRID and XLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GRID vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GRID
XLP

Industrials

24.4%

-

Technology

12.6%

-

Utilities

3.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
1.0%

Energy

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

99.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

GRID
24.4%
XLP

-

Technology

GRID
12.6%
XLP

-

Utilities

GRID
3.9%
XLP

-

Consumer Cyclical

GRID
2.4%
XLP
1.0%

Energy

GRID
1.6%
XLP

-

Basic Materials

GRID
0.0%
XLP

-

Communication Services

GRID

-

XLP

-

Consumer Defensive

GRID

-

XLP
99.0%

Financial Services

GRID

-

XLP

-

Healthcare

GRID

-

XLP

-

Real Estate

GRID

-

XLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRID vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRID vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRIDXLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.12

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

0.88

+3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.11

1.70

+12.41

GRID vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRID Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRID and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRID vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and XLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRIDXLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-35.90%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-9.69%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-12.39%

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-16.30%

-13.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-24.51%

-16.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

-4.50%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-7.06%

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

5.02%

-1.77%

Volatility

GRID vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 4.55%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRIDXLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.77%

4.55%

+5.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.77%

10.13%

+7.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.78%

12.85%

+7.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.27%

13.34%

+7.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.88%

14.75%

+8.13%

GRID vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRID vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than XLP's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.78%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRID and XLP have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to XLP (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs XLP's -35.90%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 19.71% vs 7.58% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 19.71% return vs 7.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.78% for GRID.

GRID is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.08% for XLP.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRID and XLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer