GRID vs. XAR
GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) and XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GRID returned 18.45%/yr vs 17.12%/yr for XAR. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRID charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAR.
Performance
GRID vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly higher than XAR's 7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, GRID has outperformed XAR with an annualized return of 18.45%, while XAR has yielded a comparatively lower 17.12% annualized return.
GRID
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -8.67%
- 6M
- 11.72%
- YTD
- 16.26%
- 1Y
- 25.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.88%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.44%
XAR
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -8.77%
- 6M
- -11.36%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 17.02%
- 3Y*
- 29.13%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- 17.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.23%
GRID vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 16.26% | 29.65% | 15.18% | 21.57% | -13.89% | 27.65% | 48.84% | 42.80% | -22.69% | 27.44% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 7.56% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRID and XAR is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.58 |
The correlation between GRID and XAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
GRID vs. XAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GRID
XAR
Industrials
Utilities
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
GRID
XAR
Utilities
GRID
XAR
-
Technology
GRID
XAR
Consumer Cyclical
GRID
XAR
-
Energy
GRID
XAR
-
Basic Materials
GRID
XAR
-
Communication Services
GRID
-
XAR
-
Consumer Defensive
GRID
-
XAR
-
Financial Services
GRID
-
XAR
-
Healthcare
GRID
-
XAR
-
Real Estate
GRID
-
XAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRID vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
GRID
XAR
GRID vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRID | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.12 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 0.99 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | 2.66 | +3.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRID vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum XAR drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRID | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -46.37% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -17.22% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.62% | -19.73% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -28.29% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | -46.37% | +5.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.01% | -11.36% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -6.78% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 6.45% | -2.57% |
Volatility
GRID vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a higher volatility of 8.76% compared to SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) at 6.93%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRID | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.76% | 6.93% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.36% | 22.61% | -3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.09% | 28.29% | -6.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 23.70% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 24.78% | -2.06% |
GRID vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRID vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than XAR's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 0.81% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRID and XAR have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRID has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to XAR (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs XAR's -46.37%.
On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 18.45% vs 17.12% for XAR. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XAR has been the lower-risk option at 6.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 18.45% return vs 17.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.
GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.
GRID is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while XAR is Aerospace & Defense. GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.35% for XAR.
GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRID and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer