PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRID vs. TOLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRID vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 19.50% return, which is significantly higher than TOLZ's 11.92% return. Over the past 10 years, GRID has outperformed TOLZ with an annualized return of 18.61%, while TOLZ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.41% annualized return.


GRID

1D
1.49%
1M
-1.17%
6M
10.03%
YTD
19.50%
1Y
30.04%
3Y*
22.76%
5Y*
14.44%
10Y*
18.61%
ALL TIME*
12.60%

TOLZ

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.00%
6M
7.91%
YTD
11.92%
1Y
15.41%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
7.41%
ALL TIME*
6.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$102.61M$99.71M$138.67M
$1.13M$1.57M$1.37M

GRID vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
19.50%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
11.92%14.76%11.67%6.18%-4.25%20.47%-9.46%26.84%-7.90%13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between GRID and TOLZ is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2014

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between GRID and TOLZ has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GRID vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GRID
TOLZ

Industrials

23.6%
4.8%

Technology

12.6%
0.7%

Utilities

3.9%
24.2%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
0.8%

Energy

1.6%
36.4%

Basic Materials

0.8%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

4.1%

Financial Services

-

2.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

6.9%

Industrials

GRID
23.6%
TOLZ
4.8%

Technology

GRID
12.6%
TOLZ
0.7%

Utilities

GRID
3.9%
TOLZ
24.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GRID
2.4%
TOLZ
0.8%

Energy

GRID
1.6%
TOLZ
36.4%

Basic Materials

GRID
0.8%
TOLZ

-

Communication Services

GRID

-

TOLZ

-

Consumer Defensive

GRID

-

TOLZ
4.1%

Financial Services

GRID

-

TOLZ
2.0%

Healthcare

GRID

-

TOLZ

-

Real Estate

GRID

-

TOLZ
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRID vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

TOLZ
TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GRID vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRIDTOLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

2.99

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.77

8.25

-1.48

GRID vs. TOLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRID Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the TOLZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRID and TOLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRID vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, roughly equal to the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and TOLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRIDTOLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-39.33%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.82%

-5.18%

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.62%

-9.26%

-11.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-21.85%

-7.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-39.33%

-1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.53%

-2.60%

-5.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-6.57%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

1.87%

+2.58%

Volatility

GRID vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a higher volatility of 8.94% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.22%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRIDTOLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.94%

3.22%

+5.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.34%

8.79%

+11.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.13%

10.71%

+12.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.70%

14.03%

+7.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.83%

16.24%

+6.59%

GRID vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRID vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison

GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than TOLZ's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.79%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
2.98%3.99%3.53%3.34%3.01%3.28%3.16%2.96%3.63%3.30%2.62%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRID and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to TOLZ (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 18.61% vs 7.41% for TOLZ. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 18.61% return vs 7.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.79% for GRID.

GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.46% for TOLZ.

TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRID and TOLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer