GRID vs. INCE
GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) and INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. GRID is passively managed, while INCE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GRID returned 16.83%/yr vs 11.19%/yr for INCE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRID charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for INCE.
Performance
GRID vs. INCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly higher than INCE's 13.74% return.
GRID
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- 23.59%
- 6M
- 24.02%
- 1Y
- 43.17%
- 3Y*
- 23.21%
- 5Y*
- 16.83%
- 10Y*
- 19.76%
INCE
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 13.74%
- 6M
- 14.18%
- 1Y
- 26.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- —
GRID vs. INCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 23.59% | 29.65% | 15.18% | 21.57% | -13.89% | 27.65% | 48.84% | 42.80% | -22.69% | 27.44% |
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 13.74% | 15.92% | 10.70% | 13.87% | -8.54% | 23.36% | 12.33% | 32.72% | -2.14% | 19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRID and INCE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.64 |
The correlation between GRID and INCE shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GRID vs. INCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GRID
INCE
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
GRID
INCE
Technology
GRID
INCE
Utilities
GRID
INCE
Consumer Cyclical
GRID
INCE
Energy
GRID
INCE
Basic Materials
GRID
INCE
Communication Services
GRID
-
INCE
Consumer Defensive
GRID
-
INCE
Financial Services
GRID
-
INCE
Healthcare
GRID
-
INCE
Real Estate
GRID
-
INCE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRID vs. INCE — Risk / Return Rank
GRID
INCE
GRID vs. INCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRID | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.55 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 5.18 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.89 | 19.39 | -6.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRID vs. INCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, which is greater than INCE's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and INCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRID | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -33.95% | -6.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -4.90% | -6.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -14.01% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -18.40% | -11.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.40% | -0.15% | -5.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -3.25% | -5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 1.31% | +1.94% |
Volatility
GRID vs. INCE - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) at 2.42%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRID | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.56% | 2.42% | +7.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.70% | 6.07% | +11.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.73% | 8.41% | +12.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.24% | 13.28% | +7.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 15.68% | +7.22% |
GRID vs. INCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than INCE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRID vs. INCE - Dividend Comparison
GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than INCE's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 0.80% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 4.70% | 4.71% | 3.25% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.44% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRID and INCE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRID has higher volatility (9.56%) compared to INCE (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs INCE's -33.95%.
On 5-year performance, GRID leads with 16.83% vs 11.19% for INCE. On fees, INCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GRID has performed better with a 16.83% return vs 11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.
INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.
GRID is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while INCE is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.29% for INCE.
INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRID and INCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer