PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRID vs. IGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRID vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 23.40% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's -5.55% return.


GRID

1D
-4.46%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
23.40%
6M
22.11%
1Y
42.41%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
16.63%
10Y*
19.95%

IGLD

1D
-1.96%
1M
-8.08%
YTD
-5.55%
6M
-8.37%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
20.33%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRID vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
23.40%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%19.98%
IGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
-5.55%47.46%19.36%9.24%-2.34%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between GRID and IGLD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021

0.22

The correlation between GRID and IGLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (5 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRID vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLD
IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRID vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRIDIGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.14

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

0.68

+2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.92

1.94

+10.98

GRID vs. IGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRID Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the IGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRID and IGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRID vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, which is greater than IGLD's maximum drawdown of -21.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and IGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRIDIGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-21.90%

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-21.90%

+10.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-21.90%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-21.90%

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.55%

-21.20%

+15.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-5.37%

-3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

7.68%

-4.39%

Volatility

GRID vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) at 8.14%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRIDIGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.12%

8.14%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.23%

22.34%

-4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.26%

24.40%

-3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.37%

15.48%

+5.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.80%

15.30%

+7.50%

GRID vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRID vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison

GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than IGLD's 19.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
IGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
19.29%9.91%20.81%7.85%4.45%2.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRID and IGLD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to IGLD (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs IGLD's -21.90%.

On 5-year performance, GRID leads with 16.63% vs 12.76% for IGLD. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, IGLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GRID has performed better with a 16.63% return vs 12.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.

IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 19.29%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.

GRID is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while IGLD is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.85% for IGLD.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRID and IGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer