PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRID vs. IDGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRID vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 23.40% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 45.86% return. Over the past 10 years, GRID has outperformed IDGT with an annualized return of 19.95%, while IDGT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.39% annualized return.


GRID

1D
-4.46%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
23.40%
6M
22.11%
1Y
42.41%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
16.63%
10Y*
19.95%

IDGT

1D
-1.84%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
45.86%
6M
44.45%
1Y
53.87%
3Y*
24.06%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
14.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRID vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
23.40%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
45.86%6.79%26.71%-6.09%-17.90%42.14%8.78%17.39%-1.97%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GRID and IDGT is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.63

The correlation between GRID and IDGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GRID vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GRID
IDGT

Industrials

24.2%

-

Technology

12.5%
56.9%

Utilities

3.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%

-

Energy

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

6.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

35.5%

Industrials

GRID
24.2%
IDGT

-

Technology

GRID
12.5%
IDGT
56.9%

Utilities

GRID
3.9%
IDGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

GRID
2.3%
IDGT

-

Energy

GRID
1.6%
IDGT

-

Basic Materials

GRID
0.0%
IDGT

-

Communication Services

GRID

-

IDGT
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

GRID

-

IDGT

-

Financial Services

GRID

-

IDGT

-

Healthcare

GRID

-

IDGT

-

Real Estate

GRID

-

IDGT
35.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRID vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IDGT
IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRID vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRIDIDGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

6.00

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.92

17.17

-4.25

GRID vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRID Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRID and IDGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRID vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and IDGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRIDIDGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-77.95%

+37.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-9.02%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-23.74%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-35.83%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-36.88%

-3.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.55%

-6.71%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-19.88%

+11.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

3.15%

+0.14%

Volatility

GRID vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) at 9.03%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRIDIDGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.12%

9.03%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.23%

17.61%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.26%

21.41%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.37%

23.35%

-1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.80%

23.32%

-0.52%

GRID vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRID vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than IDGT's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
0.74%1.17%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.28%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.75%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRID and IDGT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to IDGT (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs IDGT's -77.95%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 19.95% vs 14.39% for IDGT. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, IDGT has been the lower-risk option at 9.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 19.95% return vs 14.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDGT is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.74% for IDGT.

GRID is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while IDGT is Technology Equities. GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.41% for IDGT.

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRID and IDGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer