PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRFS vs. BIIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GRFS vs. BIIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grifols, S.A. (GRFS) and Biogen Inc. (BIIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRFS achieves a -22.14% return, which is significantly lower than BIIB's 13.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GRFS has underperformed BIIB with an annualized return of -6.28%, while BIIB has yielded a comparatively higher -1.36% annualized return.


GRFS

1D
-1.62%
1M
-8.77%
YTD
-22.14%
6M
-19.82%
1Y
-15.59%
3Y*
-6.06%
5Y*
-15.65%
10Y*
-6.28%

BIIB

1D
1.59%
1M
3.07%
YTD
13.48%
6M
14.32%
1Y
57.20%
3Y*
-11.13%
5Y*
-11.69%
10Y*
-1.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRFS vs. BIIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRFS
Grifols, S.A.
-22.14%27.79%-35.64%36.00%-24.31%-37.82%-20.10%29.06%-18.28%44.48%
BIIB
Biogen Inc.
13.48%15.09%-40.91%-6.55%15.42%-2.02%-17.48%-1.39%-5.54%12.34%

Correlation

The correlation between GRFS and BIIB is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2011

0.26

The correlation between GRFS and BIIB shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

GRFS:

€0.61

BIIB:

$12.48

PE Ratio

GRFS:

10.46

BIIB:

16.00

PEG Ratio

GRFS:

0.17

BIIB:

1.11

PS Ratio

GRFS:

0.58

BIIB:

2.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRFS:

€7.45B

BIIB:

$9.86B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRFS:

€2.81B

BIIB:

$5.06B

EBITDA (TTM)

GRFS:

€1.56B

BIIB:

$2.24B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRFS vs. BIIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRFS
GRFS Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GRFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRFS Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GRFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRFS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BIIB
BIIB Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BIIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIIB Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BIIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIIB Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRFS vs. BIIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grifols, S.A. (GRFS) and Biogen Inc. (BIIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRFSBIIBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.29

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

4.01

-4.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

10.02

-10.91

GRFS vs. BIIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRFS Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the BIIB Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRFS and BIIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRFS vs. BIIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRFS drawdown since its inception was -78.01%, smaller than the maximum BIIB drawdown of -89.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRFS and BIIB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRFSBIIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.01%

-89.98%

+11.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.22%

-14.34%

-17.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.68%

-60.34%

+7.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.29%

-69.28%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.01%

-72.66%

-5.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.24%

-58.04%

-12.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-36.63%

+4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.58%

5.73%

+11.85%

Volatility

GRFS vs. BIIB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grifols, S.A. (GRFS) is 6.88%, while Biogen Inc. (BIIB) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that GRFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRFSBIIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

8.30%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.38%

24.36%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.82%

33.44%

-1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.78%

34.27%

+14.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.32%

41.32%

-1.00%

Dividends

GRFS vs. BIIB - Dividend Comparison

GRFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, while BIIB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIIB
Biogen Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GRFS
Grifols, S.A.
2.41%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.20%0.83%1.55%2.32%1.24%1.67%2.01%

Financials

GRFS vs. BIIB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grifols, S.A. and Biogen Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.73B
2.48B
(GRFS) Total Revenue
(BIIB) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GRFS values in EUR, BIIB values in USD

GRFS vs. BIIB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Grifols, S.A. and Biogen Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
36.5%
0
Portfolio components
GRFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grifols, S.A. reported a gross profit of 630.20M and revenue of 1.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.5%.

BIIB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Biogen Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GRFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grifols, S.A. reported an operating income of 253.09M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.

BIIB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Biogen Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

GRFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grifols, S.A. reported a net income of 74.20M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

BIIB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Biogen Inc. reported a net income of 319.50M and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GRFS and BIIB have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIIB has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to GRFS (6.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRFS dropped -78.01% vs BIIB's -89.98%.

BIIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRFS and BIIB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer