PortfoliosLab logo
BIIB vs. CAH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BIIB and CAH is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BIIB vs. CAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Biogen Inc. (BIIB) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BIIB:

-1.61

CAH:

2.69

Sortino Ratio

BIIB:

-2.40

CAH:

3.48

Omega Ratio

BIIB:

0.73

CAH:

1.48

Calmar Ratio

BIIB:

-0.59

CAH:

3.37

Martin Ratio

BIIB:

-1.44

CAH:

16.18

Ulcer Index

BIIB:

30.91%

CAH:

3.78%

Daily Std Dev

BIIB:

28.39%

CAH:

22.19%

Max Drawdown

BIIB:

-90.00%

CAH:

-61.58%

Current Drawdown

BIIB:

-73.61%

CAH:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BIIB:

$18.40B

CAH:

$36.82B

EPS

BIIB:

$10.12

CAH:

$6.40

PE Ratio

BIIB:

12.41

CAH:

24.10

PEG Ratio

BIIB:

6.24

CAH:

0.80

PS Ratio

BIIB:

1.87

CAH:

0.17

PB Ratio

BIIB:

1.07

CAH:

16.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

BIIB:

$9.70B

CAH:

$222.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BIIB:

$7.15B

CAH:

$7.78B

EBITDA (TTM)

BIIB:

$2.15B

CAH:

$2.81B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIIB achieves a -17.87% return, which is significantly lower than CAH's 31.47% return. Over the past 10 years, BIIB has underperformed CAH with an annualized return of -10.99%, while CAH has yielded a comparatively higher 8.90% annualized return.


BIIB

YTD

-17.87%

1M

5.88%

6M

-21.50%

1Y

-45.53%

5Y*

-16.90%

10Y*

-10.99%

CAH

YTD

31.47%

1M

14.51%

6M

30.90%

1Y

58.46%

5Y*

27.84%

10Y*

8.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BIIB vs. CAH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIIB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BIIB is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BIIB is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BIIB is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BIIB is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BIIB is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BIIB is 77
Martin Ratio Rank

CAH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CAH is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CAH is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CAH is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CAH is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CAH is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CAH is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BIIB vs. CAH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Biogen Inc. (BIIB) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BIIB Sharpe Ratio is -1.61, which is lower than the CAH Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIIB and CAH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BIIB vs. CAH - Dividend Comparison

BIIB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BIIB
Biogen Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.31%1.28%1.98%2.57%3.80%3.62%3.79%4.24%2.99%2.41%1.68%1.65%

Drawdowns

BIIB vs. CAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIIB drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than CAH's maximum drawdown of -61.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIIB and CAH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BIIB vs. CAH - Volatility Comparison

Biogen Inc. (BIIB) has a higher volatility of 9.33% compared to Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) at 7.45%. This indicates that BIIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BIIB vs. CAH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Biogen Inc. and Cardinal Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20212022202320242025
2.43B
54.88B
(BIIB) Total Revenue
(CAH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BIIB vs. CAH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Biogen Inc. and Cardinal Health, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
74.1%
3.9%
(BIIB) Gross Margin
(CAH) Gross Margin
BIIB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Biogen Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 2.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.1%.

CAH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.12B and revenue of 54.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.9%.

BIIB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Biogen Inc. reported an operating income of 625.20M and revenue of 2.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.

CAH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported an operating income of 730.00M and revenue of 54.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

BIIB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Biogen Inc. reported a net income of 240.50M and revenue of 2.43B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.

CAH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a net income of 506.00M and revenue of 54.88B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.