PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GREK vs. ROAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GREK vs. ROAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GREK achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly lower than ROAM's 26.83% return. Over the past 10 years, GREK has outperformed ROAM with an annualized return of 14.00%, while ROAM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.


GREK

1D
-1.58%
1M
7.74%
YTD
11.27%
6M
12.83%
1Y
37.48%
3Y*
33.49%
5Y*
24.02%
10Y*
14.00%

ROAM

1D
-1.60%
1M
8.68%
YTD
26.83%
6M
28.99%
1Y
51.96%
3Y*
26.00%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GREK vs. ROAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GREK
Global X MSCI Greece ETF
11.27%76.11%9.53%42.72%3.64%6.14%-13.89%50.20%-31.25%34.80%
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
26.83%32.08%6.21%21.28%-14.78%9.32%2.24%8.89%-12.24%27.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GREK and ROAM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015

0.49

The correlation between GREK and ROAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

GREK vs. ROAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GREK
ROAM

Financial Services

47.1%
19.3%

Industrials

13.5%
5.6%

Utilities

11.6%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
7.6%

Energy

8.4%
5.3%

Communication Services

4.6%
6.0%

Basic Materials

3.2%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
4.8%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.3%

Healthcare

-

3.3%

Technology

-

39.4%

Financial Services

GREK
47.1%
ROAM
19.3%

Industrials

GREK
13.5%
ROAM
5.6%

Utilities

GREK
11.6%
ROAM
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GREK
9.6%
ROAM
7.6%

Energy

GREK
8.4%
ROAM
5.3%

Communication Services

GREK
4.6%
ROAM
6.0%

Basic Materials

GREK
3.2%
ROAM
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

GREK
1.1%
ROAM
4.8%

Real Estate

GREK
1.0%
ROAM
1.3%

Healthcare

GREK

-

ROAM
3.3%

Technology

GREK

-

ROAM
39.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GREK vs. ROAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GREK
GREK Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GREK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GREK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GREK Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GREK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GREK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

ROAM
ROAM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ROAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROAM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ROAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GREK vs. ROAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GREKROAMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.63

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

5.27

-3.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.49

19.91

-14.42

GREK vs. ROAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GREK Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the ROAM Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GREK and ROAM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GREKROAMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

3.50

-1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.81

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.55

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.38

-0.22

Drawdowns

GREK vs. ROAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GREK drawdown since its inception was -79.50%, which is greater than ROAM's maximum drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREK and ROAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GREKROAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.50%

-45.47%

-34.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.32%

-9.92%

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.63%

-16.79%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.46%

-27.07%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.04%

-45.47%

-11.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.00%

-1.60%

-3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.33%

-11.13%

-34.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.85%

2.62%

+4.23%

Volatility

GREK vs. ROAM - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) at 6.41%. This indicates that GREK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GREKROAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.01%

6.41%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.28%

12.76%

+7.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.97%

14.93%

+9.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.38%

15.23%

+9.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.83%

17.87%

+11.96%

GREK vs. ROAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GREK has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ROAM's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

GREK vs. ROAM - Dividend Comparison

GREK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than ROAM's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GREK
Global X MSCI Greece ETF
3.11%3.46%4.63%2.61%2.82%2.16%2.62%2.25%2.41%2.13%1.95%1.52%
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
2.50%3.17%4.15%5.40%5.23%4.22%3.04%3.55%2.54%1.84%1.89%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


GREK and ROAM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GREK has higher volatility (9.01%) compared to ROAM (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREK dropped -79.50% vs ROAM's -45.47%.

On 10-year performance, GREK leads with 14.00% vs 9.87% for ROAM. On fees, ROAM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, ROAM has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GREK has performed better with a 14.00% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROAM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for GREK.

GREK has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 2.50% for ROAM.

GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while ROAM tracks Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for GREK and 0.44% for ROAM.

ROAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GREK and ROAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer