GREK vs. RNEM

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

GREK (Global X MSCI Greece ETF) and RNEM (First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - GREK tracks the MSCI All Greece Select 25-50 while RNEM tracks the Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GREK returned 26.76%/yr vs 4.79%/yr for RNEM. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GREK charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RNEM.

Performance

GREK vs. RNEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GREK achieves a 16.27% return, which is significantly higher than RNEM's 0.25% return.

GREK

• 1D: -1.93%
• 1M: 0.72%
• 6M: 10.28%
• YTD: 16.27%
• 1Y: 28.30%
• 3Y*: 29.50%
• 5Y*: 26.76%
• 10Y*: 16.64%

RNEM

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: -1.96%
• YTD: 0.25%
• 1Y: 2.60%
• 3Y*: 6.03%
• 5Y*: 4.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GREK vs. RNEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF	16.27%	76.11%	9.53%	42.72%	3.64%	6.14%	-13.89%	50.20%	-31.25%	7.70%
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF	0.25%	15.58%	-1.47%	23.43%	-8.75%	6.16%	-8.16%	12.76%	-9.34%	11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GREK and RNEM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017	0.46

The correlation between GREK and RNEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GREK vs. RNEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GREK	RNEM
Financial Services	48.3%	35.0%
Industrials	13.2%	3.9%
Utilities	12.4%	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	9.9%
Energy	7.6%	7.0%
Communication Services	4.2%	8.7%
Basic Materials	3.2%	14.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	6.0%
Real Estate	1.0%	0.8%
Healthcare	-	4.5%
Technology	-	6.4%

Return for Risk

GREK vs. RNEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GREK

GREK Risk / Return Rank: 38
GREK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
GREK Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GREK Omega Ratio Rank: 40
GREK Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
GREK Martin Ratio Rank: 34

RNEM

RNEM Risk / Return Rank: 12
RNEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
RNEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
RNEM Omega Ratio Rank: 11
RNEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RNEM Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GREK vs. RNEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GREK	RNEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	0.21	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	0.39	+1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.05	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	0.24	+1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.11	0.65	+3.45

GREK vs. RNEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GREK Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the RNEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GREK and RNEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GREK vs. RNEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GREK drawdown since its inception was -79.50%, which is greater than RNEM's maximum drawdown of -38.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREK and RNEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GREK	RNEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.50%	-38.38%	-41.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.32%	-10.71%	-10.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.63%	-13.09%	-9.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.46%	-21.41%	-9.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.16%	-5.81%	+2.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.02%	-9.26%	-35.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.91%	3.99%	+2.92%

Volatility

GREK vs. RNEM - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) at 3.75%. This indicates that GREK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GREK	RNEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.08%	3.75%	+3.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.05%	10.93%	+10.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.35%	12.51%	+11.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.48%	14.48%	+10.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.85%	17.18%	+11.67%

GREK vs. RNEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GREK has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than RNEM's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GREK vs. RNEM - Dividend Comparison

GREK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than RNEM's 2.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF	2.57%	3.46%	4.63%	2.61%	2.82%	2.16%	2.62%	2.25%	2.41%	2.13%	1.95%	1.52%
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF	2.37%	2.75%	3.45%	1.63%	2.99%	3.20%	3.01%	2.85%	2.85%	2.28%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GREK and RNEM in my portfolio?

GREK and RNEM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GREK or RNEM?

GREK has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to RNEM (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREK dropped -79.50% vs RNEM's -38.38%.

Which ETF is better, GREK or RNEM?

On 5-year performance, GREK leads with 26.76% vs 4.79% for RNEM. On fees, GREK is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, RNEM has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GREK or RNEM?

Over the 5-year period, GREK has performed better with a 26.76% return vs 4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GREK or RNEM?

GREK is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GREK or RNEM?

GREK has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 2.37% for RNEM.

What is the main difference between GREK and RNEM?

GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while RNEM tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for GREK and 0.75% for RNEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GREK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.