GREK vs. METL
GREK (Global X MSCI Greece ETF) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GREK is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott. GREK is passively managed, while METL is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GREK charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.
Performance
GREK vs. METL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GREK achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly higher than METL's 7.51% return.
GREK
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 6M
- 11.07%
- 1Y
- 36.15%
- 3Y*
- 31.41%
- 5Y*
- 23.55%
- 10Y*
- 14.76%
METL
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GREK vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 10.53% | 5.75% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 7.51% | 27.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between GREK and METL is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GREK vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank
GREK
METL
GREK vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GREK | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GREK | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 1.18 | -1.02 |
Drawdowns
GREK vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GREK drawdown since its inception was -79.50%, which is greater than METL's maximum drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREK and METL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GREK | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.50% | -27.39% | -52.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -18.48% | +12.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.30% | -8.24% | -37.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.88% | — | — |
Volatility
GREK vs. METL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GREK | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.14% | 44.85% | -20.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.41% | 44.85% | -20.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 44.85% | -15.01% |
GREK vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GREK has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
GREK vs. METL - Dividend Comparison
GREK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than METL's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 3.13% | 3.46% | 4.63% | 2.61% | 2.82% | 2.16% | 2.62% | 2.25% | 2.41% | 2.13% | 1.95% | 1.52% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GREK and METL have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GREK is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GREK is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
GREK has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.92% for METL.
GREK is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while METL is Commodity Producers Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for GREK and 0.89% for METL.
Find the right allocation for GREK and METL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer