GREK vs. IDV
GREK (Global X MSCI Greece ETF) and IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GREK is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GREK returned 16.01%/yr vs 10.92%/yr for IDV. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GREK charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for IDV.
Performance
GREK vs. IDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GREK achieves a 15.45% return, which is significantly higher than IDV's 13.60% return. Over the past 10 years, GREK has outperformed IDV with an annualized return of 16.01%, while IDV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.92% annualized return.
GREK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 15.45%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- 1Y
- 40.83%
- 3Y*
- 32.67%
- 5Y*
- 24.30%
- 10Y*
- 16.01%
IDV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 36.40%
- 3Y*
- 25.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
GREK vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 15.45% | 76.11% | 9.53% | 42.72% | 3.64% | 6.14% | -13.89% | 50.20% | -31.25% | 34.80% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 13.60% | 52.16% | 4.00% | 10.32% | -6.40% | 12.00% | -5.94% | 23.56% | -10.37% | 19.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between GREK and IDV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2011 | 0.56 |
The correlation between GREK and IDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
GREK vs. IDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GREK
IDV
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
GREK
IDV
Industrials
GREK
IDV
Utilities
GREK
IDV
Consumer Cyclical
GREK
IDV
Energy
GREK
IDV
Communication Services
GREK
IDV
Basic Materials
GREK
IDV
Consumer Defensive
GREK
IDV
Real Estate
GREK
IDV
Healthcare
GREK
-
IDV
-
Technology
GREK
-
IDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GREK vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank
GREK
IDV
GREK vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GREK | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.49 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 4.13 | -2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 15.32 | -9.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GREK vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GREK drawdown since its inception was -79.50%, which is greater than IDV's maximum drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREK and IDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GREK | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.50% | -70.14% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.32% | -8.52% | -12.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.63% | -11.86% | -10.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.46% | -29.19% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.04% | -42.50% | -14.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -1.70% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.25% | -15.38% | -29.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.90% | 2.30% | +4.60% |
Volatility
GREK vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison
Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) at 4.24%. This indicates that GREK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GREK | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.69% | 4.24% | +4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.65% | 10.88% | +9.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.35% | 13.10% | +11.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.44% | 15.58% | +8.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.71% | 17.92% | +11.79% |
GREK vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GREK has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
GREK vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison
GREK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than IDV's 4.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 3.00% | 3.46% | 4.63% | 2.61% | 2.82% | 2.16% | 2.62% | 2.25% | 2.41% | 2.13% | 1.95% | 1.52% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 4.40% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GREK and IDV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GREK has higher volatility (8.69%) compared to IDV (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREK dropped -79.50% vs IDV's -70.14%.
On 10-year performance, GREK leads with 16.01% vs 10.92% for IDV. On fees, IDV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, IDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GREK has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 10.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for GREK.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 3.00% for GREK.
GREK is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IDV is Global Equities. GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for GREK and 0.49% for IDV.
IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GREK and IDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer