GREK vs. ICSH
GREK (Global X MSCI Greece ETF) and ICSH (iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GREK is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while ICSH is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. GREK is passively managed, while ICSH is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, GREK returned 16.01%/yr vs 2.78%/yr for ICSH. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GREK charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for ICSH.
Performance
GREK vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GREK achieves a 15.45% return, which is significantly higher than ICSH's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, GREK has outperformed ICSH with an annualized return of 16.01%, while ICSH has yielded a comparatively lower 2.78% annualized return.
GREK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 15.45%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- 1Y
- 40.83%
- 3Y*
- 32.67%
- 5Y*
- 24.30%
- 10Y*
- 16.01%
ICSH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
GREK vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 15.45% | 76.11% | 9.53% | 42.72% | 3.64% | 6.14% | -13.89% | 50.20% | -31.25% | 34.80% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 1.53% | 4.96% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 0.97% | 0.16% | 1.61% | 3.17% | 2.25% | 1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GREK and ICSH is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013 | 0.05 |
The correlation between GREK and ICSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GREK vs. ICSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GREK
ICSH
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Financial Services
GREK
ICSH
-
Industrials
GREK
ICSH
-
Utilities
GREK
ICSH
Consumer Cyclical
GREK
ICSH
-
Energy
GREK
ICSH
-
Communication Services
GREK
ICSH
-
Basic Materials
GREK
ICSH
-
Consumer Defensive
GREK
ICSH
-
Real Estate
GREK
ICSH
-
Healthcare
GREK
-
ICSH
-
Technology
GREK
-
ICSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GREK vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank
GREK
ICSH
GREK vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GREK | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -25.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 6.59 | -5.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 43.88 | -42.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 290.20 | -284.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GREK vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GREK drawdown since its inception was -79.50%, which is greater than ICSH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREK and ICSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GREK | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.50% | -3.94% | -75.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.32% | -0.10% | -21.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.63% | -0.10% | -22.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.46% | -0.73% | -29.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.04% | -3.94% | -53.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | 0.00% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.25% | -0.08% | -45.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.90% | 0.01% | +6.89% |
Volatility
GREK vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison
Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.13%. This indicates that GREK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GREK | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.69% | 0.13% | +8.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.65% | 0.29% | +20.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.35% | 0.39% | +23.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.44% | 0.48% | +23.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.71% | 1.06% | +28.65% |
GREK vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GREK has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
GREK vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison
GREK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than ICSH's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 3.00% | 3.46% | 4.63% | 2.61% | 2.82% | 2.16% | 2.62% | 2.25% | 2.41% | 2.13% | 1.95% | 1.52% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.34% | 4.55% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GREK and ICSH have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GREK has higher volatility (8.69%) compared to ICSH (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREK dropped -79.50% vs ICSH's -3.94%.
On 10-year performance, GREK leads with 16.01% vs 2.78% for ICSH. On fees, ICSH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ICSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GREK has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICSH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for GREK.
ICSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 3.00% for GREK.
GREK is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ICSH is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for GREK and 0.08% for ICSH.
ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.98 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GREK and ICSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer