GRC vs. CINF
GRC (The Gorman-Rupp Company) and CINF (Cincinnati Financial Corporation) are both stocks. GRC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while CINF operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, GRC returned 14.38%/yr vs 11.95%/yr for CINF. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GRC vs. CINF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRC achieves a 70.94% return, which is significantly higher than CINF's 10.03% return. Over the past 10 years, GRC has outperformed CINF with an annualized return of 14.38%, while CINF has yielded a comparatively lower 11.95% annualized return.
GRC
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -8.49%
- 6M
- 49.80%
- YTD
- 70.94%
- 1Y
- 100.02%
- 3Y*
- 38.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.19%
CINF
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- 6M
- 11.70%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 23.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $158.60M | $174.30M | $143.71M | |
| $19.01M | $17.85M | $14.41M |
GRC vs. CINF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 70.94% | 28.24% | 8.87% | 42.15% | -41.17% | 39.71% | -11.90% | 17.64% | 11.75% | 2.49% |
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 10.03% | 16.27% | 42.48% | 4.00% | -7.89% | 33.28% | -14.15% | 38.87% | 6.25% | 2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRC and CINF is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.35 |
The correlation between GRC and CINF shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.39 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GRC:
$2.14B
CINF:
$27.27B
GRC:
$2.37
CINF:
$28.19
GRC:
34.27
CINF:
6.30
GRC:
0.70
CINF:
0.19
GRC:
3.04
CINF:
1.50
GRC:
$702.05M
CINF:
$13.95B
GRC:
$214.56M
CINF:
$4.91B
GRC:
$129.99M
CINF:
$2.73B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRC vs. CINF — Risk / Return Rank
GRC
CINF
GRC vs. CINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) and Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRC | CINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.20 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.75 | 2.22 | +4.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.21 | 5.31 | +11.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRC vs. CINF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRC drawdown since its inception was -67.23%, which is greater than CINF's maximum drawdown of -59.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRC and CINF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRC | CINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.23% | -59.64% | -7.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -10.46% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.87% | -20.03% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.26% | -35.77% | -13.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.26% | -58.12% | +8.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.50% | -7.47% | -4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.59% | -12.16% | -5.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.83% | 4.37% | +1.46% |
Volatility
GRC vs. CINF - Volatility Comparison
The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) has a higher volatility of 12.13% compared to Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) at 10.14%. This indicates that GRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CINF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRC | CINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.13% | 10.14% | +1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.07% | 17.07% | +13.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.80% | 21.21% | +14.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.19% | 25.76% | +5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.00% | 28.97% | +5.03% |
Dividends
GRC vs. CINF - Dividend Comparison
GRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than CINF's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 2.04% | 2.13% | 2.25% | 2.90% | 2.70% | 2.21% | 2.75% | 2.13% | 2.74% | 3.33% | 2.53% | 3.89% |
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 0.93% | 1.56% | 1.91% | 1.98% | 2.67% | 1.43% | 1.82% | 1.47% | 7.74% | 1.51% | 1.39% | 1.52% |
Financials
GRC vs. CINF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Gorman-Rupp Company and Cincinnati Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GRC vs. CINF - Profitability Comparison
GRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a gross profit of 63.69M and revenue of 186.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.2%.
CINF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported an operating income of 30.41M and revenue of 186.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
CINF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
GRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a net income of 19.43M and revenue of 186.07M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
CINF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.26B and revenue of 4.27B, resulting in a net margin of 29.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRC and CINF have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRC has higher volatility (12.13%) compared to CINF (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRC dropped -67.23% vs CINF's -59.64%.
GRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRC and CINF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer