PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRAG vs. NTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRAG vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF (GRAG) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GRAG

1D
-9.91%
1M
-12.45%
YTD
-58.07%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NTSD

1D
-1.11%
1M
7.13%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRAG vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GRAG and NTSD is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026

0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRAG vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF (GRAG) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GRAG vs. NTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRAGNTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.25

5.08

-6.33

Drawdowns

GRAG vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRAG drawdown since its inception was -62.22%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRAG and NTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRAGNTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.22%

-5.20%

-57.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.22%

-1.11%

-61.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.65%

-0.84%

-38.81%

Volatility

GRAG vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRAGNTSDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.83%

24.28%

+45.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.83%

24.28%

+45.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.83%

24.28%

+45.55%

GRAG vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRAG vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

Neither GRAG nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GRAG and NTSD have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRAG.

GRAG and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRAG and 0.35% for NTSD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRAG and NTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer