GRAG vs. AXUP
GRAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF) and AXUP (T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GRAG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for AXUP.
Performance
GRAG vs. AXUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GRAG
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -13.44%
- YTD
- -56.93%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AXUP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRAG vs. AXUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRAG Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF | -56.93% | -7.82% |
AXUP T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF | -34.20% | -5.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRAG and AXUP is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRAG vs. AXUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF (GRAG) and T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF (AXUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRAG | AXUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.24 | — | — |
Drawdowns
GRAG vs. AXUP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRAG | AXUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.19% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.83% | — | — |
Volatility
GRAG vs. AXUP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRAG | AXUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.71% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.71% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.71% | — | — |
GRAG vs. AXUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AXUP's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRAG vs. AXUP - Dividend Comparison
Neither GRAG nor AXUP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRAG and AXUP have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GRAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GRAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AXUP.
GRAG and AXUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tuttle Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRAG and 1.50% for AXUP.
Find the right allocation for GRAG and AXUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer