AXUP vs. CORD
AXUP (T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF) and CORD (T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AXUP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tuttle Capital Management, while CORD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Tuttle Capital Management. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
AXUP vs. CORD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AXUP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CORD
- 1D
- 11.26%
- 1M
- -24.83%
- YTD
- -88.71%
- 6M
- -84.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AXUP vs. CORD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AXUP T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF | -34.20% | -42.48% |
CORD T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF | -88.71% | 53.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between AXUP and CORD is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AXUP vs. CORD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF (AXUP) and T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AXUP vs. CORD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AXUP | CORD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -93.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -92.63% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -58.30% | — |
Volatility
AXUP vs. CORD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AXUP | CORD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 185.44% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 185.44% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 185.44% | — |
AXUP vs. CORD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AXUP and CORD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
AXUP vs. CORD - Dividend Comparison
Neither AXUP nor CORD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AXUP and CORD have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AXUP and CORD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
AXUP and CORD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
AXUP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CORD is Inverse Equities.
Find the right allocation for AXUP and CORD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer