PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQRE vs. QLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQRE vs. QLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQRE achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly higher than QLV's 3.44% return.


GQRE

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
10.03%
6M
9.92%
1Y
13.69%
3Y*
11.64%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
4.25%

QLV

1D
-0.65%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
3.44%
6M
2.44%
1Y
12.05%
3Y*
14.12%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQRE vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GQRE
FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund
10.03%8.27%6.09%9.21%-27.22%32.01%-9.17%3.30%
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
3.44%12.28%18.08%13.71%-9.97%26.08%9.63%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GQRE and QLV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.74

The correlation between GQRE and QLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQRE vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQRE
GQRE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GQRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

QLV
QLV Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQRE vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GQREQLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.28

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

1.95

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.09

8.05

-2.96

GQRE vs. QLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the QLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQRE and QLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GQRE vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQRE drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than QLV's maximum drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQRE and QLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQREQLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-33.71%

-8.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-6.19%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.17%

-12.05%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.08%

-17.93%

-17.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-2.73%

+1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-3.98%

-5.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

1.50%

+1.19%

Volatility

GQRE vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) at 2.03%. This indicates that GQRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQREQLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

2.03%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

5.55%

+3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

7.62%

+4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

12.63%

+3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

16.51%

+1.13%

GQRE vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQRE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQRE vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison

GQRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than QLV's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQRE
FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund
4.27%4.75%3.77%2.91%2.56%2.36%2.05%4.29%3.22%1.97%4.16%2.32%
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
1.61%1.60%1.66%1.60%1.74%0.96%1.24%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQRE and QLV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GQRE has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to QLV (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQRE dropped -41.87% vs QLV's -33.71%.

On 5-year performance, QLV leads with 9.76% vs 2.37% for GQRE. On fees, QLV is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QLV has performed better with a 9.76% return vs 2.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLV is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GQRE.

GQRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 1.61% for QLV.

GQRE is categorized as REIT, while QLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. GQRE tracks Northern Trust Global Quality Real Estate (NR), while QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GQRE and 0.22% for QLV.

QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQRE and QLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer