PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQRE vs. RLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQRE vs. RLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQRE achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 14.42% return. Over the past 10 years, GQRE has underperformed RLY with an annualized return of 3.83%, while RLY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.16% annualized return.


GQRE

1D
0.13%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
8.43%
6M
9.40%
1Y
13.08%
3Y*
10.50%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
3.83%

RLY

1D
-2.18%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
14.42%
6M
15.47%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
14.14%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
8.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQRE vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GQRE
FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund
8.43%8.27%6.09%9.21%-27.22%32.01%-9.17%21.84%-8.88%13.60%
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
14.42%20.26%2.53%2.56%7.86%22.85%-0.59%15.63%-11.72%10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between GQRE and RLY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2013

0.59

The correlation between GQRE and RLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GQRE vs. RLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GQRE
RLY

Real Estate

87.9%
5.4%

Financial Services

2.0%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
2.6%

Technology

0.8%

-

Healthcare

0.6%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
3.6%

Utilities

0.5%
15.9%

Communication Services

0.5%

-

Industrials

0.2%
16.5%

Basic Materials

0.0%
25.1%

Energy

-

30.1%

Real Estate

GQRE
87.9%
RLY
5.4%

Financial Services

GQRE
2.0%
RLY
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GQRE
1.0%
RLY
2.6%

Technology

GQRE
0.8%
RLY

-

Healthcare

GQRE
0.6%
RLY
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

GQRE
0.5%
RLY
3.6%

Utilities

GQRE
0.5%
RLY
15.9%

Communication Services

GQRE
0.5%
RLY

-

Industrials

GQRE
0.2%
RLY
16.5%

Basic Materials

GQRE
0.0%
RLY
25.1%

Energy

GQRE

-

RLY
30.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQRE vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQRE
GQRE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GQRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

RLY
RLY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQRE vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GQRERLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.51

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

7.32

-6.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

26.80

-21.88

GQRE vs. RLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the RLY Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQRE and RLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GQRERLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

2.75

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.73

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.59

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.36

-0.06

Drawdowns

GQRE vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQRE drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than RLY's maximum drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQRE and RLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQRERLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-37.75%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-3.88%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.17%

-10.08%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.08%

-18.94%

-16.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.87%

-34.17%

-7.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-3.88%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.23%

-9.45%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

1.06%

+1.61%

Volatility

GQRE vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) is 3.22%, while SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that GQRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQRERLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

3.61%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

8.46%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

10.32%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

13.56%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.66%

13.83%

+3.83%

GQRE vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQRE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQRE vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison

GQRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than RLY's 2.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQRE
FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund
4.31%4.75%3.77%2.91%2.56%2.36%2.05%4.29%3.22%1.97%4.16%2.32%
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
2.93%3.24%3.31%3.71%5.66%12.15%2.16%3.45%2.76%1.85%2.07%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQRE and RLY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RLY has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to GQRE (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQRE dropped -41.87% vs RLY's -37.75%.

On 10-year performance, RLY leads with 8.16% vs 3.83% for GQRE. On fees, GQRE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GQRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RLY has performed better with a 8.16% return vs 3.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GQRE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.

GQRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 2.93% for RLY.

GQRE is categorized as REIT, while RLY is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GQRE and 0.50% for RLY.

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQRE and RLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer