PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQRE vs. QIDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQRE vs. QIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GQRE having a 11.97% return and QIDX slightly higher at 12.48%.


GQRE

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.70%
6M
7.91%
YTD
11.97%
1Y
15.04%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
3.74%
ALL TIME*
5.21%

QIDX

1D
0.67%
1M
2.19%
6M
8.52%
YTD
12.48%
1Y
14.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.01M$668.95K$807.17K
$63.64K$64.65K$42.83K

GQRE vs. QIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GQRE and QIDX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025

0.60

The correlation between GQRE and QIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQRE vs. QIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GQRE
GQRE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GQRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

QIDX
QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GQRE vs. QIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GQREQIDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

2.15

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.74

7.21

-1.47

GQRE vs. QIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the QIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQRE and QIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GQRE vs. QIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQRE drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than QIDX's maximum drawdown of -14.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQRE and QIDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQREQIDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-14.99%

-26.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-6.92%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

0.00%

-2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.13%

-2.12%

-7.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.06%

+0.57%

Volatility

GQRE vs. QIDX - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) at 2.85%. This indicates that GQRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQREQIDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

2.85%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.37%

8.25%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.72%

11.01%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

14.20%

+2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

14.20%

+3.44%

GQRE vs. QIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQRE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QIDX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQRE vs. QIDX - Dividend Comparison

GQRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than QIDX's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQRE
FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund
4.19%4.75%3.77%2.91%2.56%2.36%2.05%4.29%3.22%1.97%4.16%2.32%
QIDX
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF
0.84%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQRE and QIDX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GQRE has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to QIDX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQRE dropped -41.87% vs QIDX's -14.99%.

On 1-year performance, GQRE leads with 15.04% vs 14.81% for QIDX. On fees, GQRE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, QIDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GQRE has performed better with a 15.04% return vs 14.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GQRE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QIDX.

GQRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 0.84% for QIDX.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Indexperts. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GQRE and 0.50% for QIDX.

QIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQRE and QIDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer